Intergroup Attitudes as a Function of Different Dimensions of Group Identification and Perceived Intergroup Conflict

By J. Jackson. 2002

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86dcc95b6504b36f81daf3b4f40f18b8a3c7363d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Category salience and organizational identification (2005, background): “intention to go the extra-mile may be a form of collective action (see Kelly & Kelly, 1994) against the negative public reputation they think is associated with their occupation. The idea of identification as a flexible concept is of course not new in the research community. Doosje, Spears, and Elle”
Exploring predictors of organizational identification: Moderating role of trust on the associations between empowerment, organizational support, and identification (2010, background): “The behavioural component includes the collective behaviours of employees, which are vitally important for human resource management, such as internalization of organizational norms and practices, desire to remain with the organization and willingness to cooperate with others, and organizational cit”
Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Organizational Identification (2012, background): “They presented the work of Pratt (1998), 18 Tajfel (1978), Ellemers, de Gilder, and Haslam (2004), and Jackson (2002) as theoretical evidence that the following dimensions of social identity can be distinguished: a) a cognitive component, which is the knowledge an individual has of belonging to a…”
Three-Dimensional Strength of Identification Across Group Memberships: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2005, background): “Ingroup affect, refers to the emotional evaluation of that group membership, encapsulating the affective dimension that has emerged in many studies (e.g., Ellemers et al., 1999; Jackson, 2002; Hinkle et al., 1989).”
Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. (2008, methodology): “turned to Jackson’s (2002) Self-Categorization scale to assess facets of in-group identification relevant to self-definition. Although the 11 items we took from Jackson (2002) were all designed to assess a global “self-categorization” component ( Dutch .77; European .82), they appear to tap at least”
A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity (2004, methodology): “…social identification occurs along a single low/high dimension, or whether it is better represented in terms of several separable facets (Brown et al., 1986; Deaux, 1996; Ellemers, Kortekaas, & Ouwerkerk, 1999; Hinkle, Taylor, Fox-Cardamone, & Crook, 1989; Jackson, 2002; Jackson & Smith, 1999).”
When Group Memberships are Negative: The Concept, Measurement, and Behavioral Implications of Psychological Disidentification (2014, background): “, 1999; see also Jackson, 2002) and dissimilarity as separate factor (parallel to a cognitive/self-categorization factor of identification in models by Ellemers et al., 1999; Jackson, 2002).”