Three-Dimensional Strength of Identification Across Group Memberships: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

By Patricia L. Obst, Katherine M. White. 2005

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b295d37d8b90937c703488c95844bc83ae824c2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Katherine M. White
2. N. Jimmieson
3. Megan Peach
4. Patricia L. Obst
5. M. Bruner
6. J. Côté
7. I. Boardley
8. David J. Hancock

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Katherine M. White
2. N. Jimmieson
3. Megan Peach
4. Patricia L. Obst
5. J. Côté
6. M. Bruner
7. I. Boardley
8. Mark D. Griffiths

Citations in the corpus

• Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Inform Change Management (2008, methodology): “Recent confirmatory factor analytic work has supported this three-factor model of social identification (Obst & White, 2005).”
• Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. (2014, background): “Early laboratory work by Tajfel et al. (1971) demonstrated that simply categorizing participants into different groups based upon a trivial criterion (e.”
• Choosing to belong: The influence of choice on social identification and psychological sense of community (2007, methodology): “However, in the current study a modified version of the scale was used, which has been shown to provide an adequate measure of the four dimensions of PSOC, as well as overall PSOC (Obst & White, 2004a).”