Value Added to What? How a Ceiling in the Testing Instrument Influences Value-Added Estimation
By C. Koedel, Julia Betts. Education Finance and Policy, 2009
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86b71b5a5ba0c5d1cf7c11789de75cd1579d156c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Josh Kinsler
- G. Marschke
- H. Braun
- Maria D. Fitzpatrick
- Carolyn J. Heinrich
- D. Grissmer
- Naomi Chudowsky
- Sarah Hastedt
Citations in the corpus
- Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems (2010, methodology): “…the random component and to reduce the noise in the measure of current effort, an approach that is currently being used in many school districts to measure the value-added of an additional year of schooling on student achievement (Harris and Sass, 2006; Koedel and Betts, 2008; Rothstein, J., 2008).”
- What a difference a day makes: Estimating daily learning gains during kindergarten and first grade using a natural experiment (2011, background): “Koedel and Betts (2008) argue that a test score distribution’s skewness is”
- Getting Value Out of Value-Added: Report of a Workshop (2010, methodology): “Sean Reardon pointed out a similar situation based on the use of a value-added model in San Diego (Koedel and Betts, 2009).”
- Assessing Rothstein's critique of teacher value‐added models (2012, background): “3See, for example, Kane and Staiger (2002), Amrein-Beardsley (2008), Harris and Sass (2011), Martineau (2006), Koedel and Betts (2010b), and Koretz (2002).”