Contributing to Discourse

By Herbert H. Clark, E. Schaefer. 1989

Subfields: Computational Linguistics & Semantics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Linguistics & Semantics

Citations in the corpus

Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs (2022, background): “municate about relationships and personal experiences (Clark and Schaefer, 1989; Dunbar, 1993).”
End-to-end optimization of goal-driven and visually grounded dialogue systems (2017, background): “It is part of the so called Common Ground , well studied in the discourse literature [ Clark and Schaefer, 1989 ] .”
Critical Questions and Argument Stratagems: A Framework for Enhancing and Analyzing Students' Reasoning Practices (2011, background): “Dialectical arguments among two or more people on political choices, such as whether to go to war or redistribute wealth, require an appeal to the common beliefs and values of the people, what Aristotle called endoxa ( Walton, Reed, & Macagno, 2008 ) and what learning scientists would call common”
Social Influences on the Development of Children's Adaptive Help Seeking: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers☆ (2000, background): “Similar schemes for analyzing requests and questions are found in Clark and Schaefer (1989), Flammer (1981), and Graesser, Person, and Huber (1992). and where a myriad of academic as well as social goals motivate students’ behavior (Wentzel, 1996).”
Collaborative Effort towards Common Ground in Situated Human-Robot Dialogue (2014, background): “This is one type of collaborative behavior referred to as installment [6].”
Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use (2012, background): “The somewhat weaker effects of feedback provide tentative evidence that different forms of feedback provide different strengths of information about whether the information in question is, in fact, common ground (Clark & Schaefer, 1989; also Roque & Traum, 2008, 2009).”
An Interactional Analysis of Clinical Interviewing (2007, background): “She is more likely misinterpreting ongoing acknowledgment of her contributions (Clark & Schaefer, 1989) as approval.]”
Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue (2014, background): “Coordination in dialogue (taking place on Clark and Schaefer’s (1989) presentational track) may lead to adaptation between speakers based on agreement or grounding of the conveyed message.”
Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom (2006, background): “The explanation was SITUATIVE EXPLANATION OF TRANSFER 469 9Techniques for determining what is in common ground exist for dyadic interactions (e.g., Clark & Schaefer, 1989).”
Perspectival Understanding of Conceptions and Conceptual Growth in Interaction (2007, methodology): “In interaction involving more than one participant, we assume that operations that contribute progress in problem solving or understanding are products of joint action that Clark and Schaefer (1989) called “contributions to discourse.””
New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL (2013, background): “Building and maintaining common ground means individuals construct shared understanding, knowledge, and beliefs (Clark & Schaefer, 1989).”
Promoting teacher reflection: what is said to be done (2011, background): “The nature and extent of explication and empirical support given to a particular reflective model will determine whether the model provides a solid ground for reflective practice (Dillenbourg 1999 ; Clark and Schaefer 1989 ).”
Attenuating Information in Spoken Communication: For the Speaker, or for the Addressee?. (2010, background): “…may introduce it with a lengthy and provisional description that becomes shorter later in the conversation, after it has been ratified or modified by the addressee during an interactive process of conversational grounding (Clark & Brennan, 1991; Clark & Schaefer, 1989; Clark & Wilkes-Gibbs, 1986).”
Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction (2017, background): “Consideration of divergent claims was seen in how students acknowledged and expressed attunement to opposing claims through back-channeling and referencing as well as gesturing, nodding, and an attentive gaze (Allwood et al., 1993; Clark & Schaefer, 1989).”
Empirical Methods for Evaluating Dialog Systems (2001, background): “As psychologists have long recognized, when people engage in conversation, they make sure that they mutually understand the goals, roles, and behaviors that can be expected (Clark, 1996; Clark & Brennan, 1991; Clark & Schaefer, 1989; Paek & Horvitz, 1999, 2000).”
We Remember, We Forget: Collaborative Remembering in Older Couples (2011, result): “Although we were surprised that acknowledgments were associated with Factor 2 (see Table 4) and so predicted poorer recall (see Table 5), this finding is consistent with Clark and Schaefer’s (1989) characterization of acknowledgments as providing a weaker evidence of understanding than other listene”