Workaholism as Discretionary Time Investment at Work: An Experience‐Sampling Study
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84fbe307d6d8ce34740df21411c3880f66b8bfc7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Daantje Derks
- M. Tims
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Hans De Witte
- Yehuda Baruch
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Daantje Derks
- Sabine Sonnentag
- M. Tims
- Toon W. Taris
- Hans De Witte
Citations in the corpus
- The positive wellbeing aspects of workaholism in cross cultural perspective (2011, result): “For example, workaholics were found to experience more positive affect during work than during leisure activity, by comparison to non-workaholics ( Snir and Zohar, 2008”
- All Work and No Play? A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Correlates and Outcomes of Workaholism (2016, background): “…of the two momentary studies of workaholism, Bakker et al. (2013) did not examine emotions at work (only evening happiness), and while Snir and Zohar (2008) found that workaholics reported higher PA associated with work than leisure compared to nonworkaholics, they operationalized…”
- Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect (2008, background): “In our study, a person’s general level of work engagement was not related to week-specific experiences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time (r� .02, Table 1). This finding is in line with earlier research on work engagement and workaholism (Schaufeli et al., 2008; Snir & Zohar,”
- Beyond workaholism: Towards a general model of heavy work investment (2012, methodology): “Heavy Work Investment (HWI): a two-dimensional concept The shortcomings of previous workaholism research led Snir and Zohar (2008) to define workaholism as heavy time investment in work that does not stem from external demands (e.g., financial needs).”
- Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement (2015, background): “This should be particularly the case when thoughts about work or work-related activities intrude the home domain after the end of the formal working day (Snir & Zohar, 2008).”
- Understanding Workaholics' Motivations: A Self-Determination Perspective (2011, methodology): “McMillan and O’Driscoll (2004) as well as Snir and Zohar (2008), for example, found no differences between workaholics and non-workaholics in terms of mental health and positive affect.”
- Being Driven to Work Excessively Hard (2009, methodology): “This can be studied by using ecological Momentary assessment (Stone & Shiffman, 1994), a method that has only occasionally applied to study workaholism (Snir & Zohar, 2008).”
- Workaholism and daily recovery : a day reconstruction study of leisure activities (2013, background): “We expect that particularly employees high (versus low) in workaholism profit from the distracting function of social activities, again because otherwise they would continue to ruminate about work (cf. Snir & Zohar, 2008).”
- The Individual “Costs” of Workaholism: An Analysis Based on Multisource and Prospective Data (2018, background): “We believe that our findings constitute a step ahead toward understanding of the affective nature of workaholism, because in contrast with previous research (e.g., Snir & Zohar, 2008), we used more comprehensive measures of job-related affect.”