Learning from Our Mistakes: Error Management Training for Mature Learners
By Kelly A. Chillarege, C. Nordstrom, Karen B. Williams. 2003
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84ca6c813fb9ceb10233c22b3d6a3c42eb8267c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Michael Frese
- Cathy van Dyck
- Nina Keith
- Tom Elfring
- Paul L. Koopman
- Dick de Gilder
- Sharon K. Parker
- Arnold B. Bakker
In Social Psychology
- Michael Frese
- Nina Keith
- Tom Elfring
- Paul L. Koopman
- Dick de Gilder
- Sharon K. Parker
- M. Schippers
- Deanne N. den Hartog
Citations in the corpus
- Learning from Error: The influence of error incident characteristics (2009, background): “Experimental error training studies, for example, support the notion that errors can have a positive and informative function (Chillarege et al., 2003; Heimbeck et al., 2003).”
- Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. (2008, unknown): “Mastery training Chillarege et al. (2003) Exploratory learning: Error/ability framing: Self-evaluative guidance: Kozlowski & Bell (2006) Kozlowski et al.”
- Self-regulation in error management training: emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. (2005, methodology): “Second, our results concerning the superiority of error management training compared to error avoidant training replicated results of other studies with similar effect sizes (Chillarege et al., 2003; Dormann & Frese, 1994; Heimbeck et al., 2003; Frese et al., 1991; Ivancic & Hesketh, 2000; Nordstrom”