Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect.

By R. Zajonc. 2000

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82ec3a47fa559719fa6f66b92fa5695d30ee6e9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Affect in Web Interfaces: A Study of the Impacts of Web Page Visual Complexity and Order (2010, background): “Unfamiliarity with the website was required because familiarity with a certain category of website may influence perceived complexity of (Radocy and Boyle 1988) and liking for the webpage stimuli (Bornstein 1989; Zajonc 2000).”
On the nature of implicit self-esteem: The case of the name letter effect. (2002, background): “In an extensive program of research, Zajonc (1980, 2000) and associates have convincingly argued that affective influences often occur outside of phenomenal awareness.”
Personality, basic emotions, and satisfaction: Primary emotions in the mountaineering experience (2011, background): “Recent neuropsychological research has confirmed that emotions do, in some instances, occur without being preceded by cognitive appraisal (e.g. LeDoux, 1996, 2000; Zajonc, 2000).”
The Role of Affect in Public Support and Opposition to Wolf Management (2012, background): “These studies show that people evaluate stimuli more positively after mere exposure—even when exposure times are so short that individuals are not consciously aware of the exposure (see Kunst-Wilson and Zajonc, 1980; Zajonc 2000).”
Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings (2004, background): “For instance, the-effect-of-mere-exposure model (Bornstein & D’Agostino, 1992; Harrison, 1977; Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc, 1980; Zajonc, 1968, 1980, 2000), according to which it is (moderate) familiarity that should induce (highest) pleasure, accounts for only some of our findings.”
Unconscious Affective Reactions to Masked Happy Versus Angry Faces Influence Consumption Behavior and Judgments of Value (2005, background): “…subliminal stimuli and procedures, including gory scenes embedded in movies (Robles, Smith, Carver, & Wellens, 1987), snakes presented to phobic participants (Öhman & Soares, 1994), mereexposed ideographs (Monahan, Murphy, & Zajonc, 2000), and words related to participants’ goals (Chartrand, 2002).”
Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. (2001, background): “The assumption that positive affect is directly related to processing ease may also explain why, in the mereexposure studies, covarying out participants' judgments of familiarity did not fully eliminate the effects of repetition on liking ( Zajonc, 2000 ).”
Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making (2004, background): “Similarly, Monahan, Murphy, and Zajonc (2000) observed that repeated exposure to initially neutral stimuli improved participants’ self-reported mood.”
Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, unknown): “Zajonc [47,48] asserts a similar position with respect to humans, arguing that affective states can be induced with no cognitive involvement whatsoever (‘preferences without inferences’; see also [24]).”
The seven sins of evolutionary psychology (2001, background): “In short, the classic distinction between emotional and cognitive processes is sustained by abundant data indicating that the two can be dissociated functionally and anatomically (e.g., ZAJONC 2000; PANKSEPP 1990c, 2000b).”
The social psychology of stigma. (2005, background): “Stigma has been linked to poor mental health, physical illness, academic underachievement, infant mortality, low social status, poverty, and reduced access to housing, education, and jobs (Allison 1998, Braddock & McPartland 1987, Clark et al. 1999, Yinger 1994).”
Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. (2004, background): “When categorizing the world around them, people emphasize dimensions that are personally relevant (Zajonc, 2000).”
Impacts of the built environment and travel behaviour on attitudes: Theories underpinning the reverse causality hypothesis (2019, background): “Satisfaction can even be regarded as the dominant force in attitude formation (Zajonc, 2000).”