On the nature of implicit self-esteem: The case of the name letter effect.
By Sander L. Koole, B. Pelham. 2002
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31b5c99cef22e74b8b81d808c8ad4e467b0289b2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Constantine Sedikides
- Bogdan Wojciszke
- Jochen E. Gebauer
- A. Gregg
- Tracy DeHart
- M. Riketta
- Sander L. Koole
- B. Pelham
Citations in the corpus
- “How much do you like your name?” An implicit measure of global self-esteem (2008, methodology): “Koole and Pelham (2003) argued that the strength of the mere-ownership effect is more indicative of global self-esteem when the owned object is more representative of the self.”
- Narcissistic Fragility: Rethinking Its Links to Explicit and Implicit Self-esteem (2010, background): “The two most commonly used indices of ISE are the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), in which respondents attempt to rapidly co-classify stimuli into corresponding categories, and the Name Letter Task or Initials Preference Task (NLT or IPT; Koole & Pelham, 2003), ”
- Subjective evaluations of intelligence and academic self-concept predict academic achievement: Evidence from a selective student population (2009, unknown): “…the rationale for use of such constructs as self-concept or self-theories (Dweck, 1999, 2006; Markus & Wurf, 1987), self-esteem (Mruk, 2006; Koole & Pelham, 2003; Rodewalt & Tragakis, 2003), and self-efficacy (Bandura, 1986, 1997;Multon, Brown, & Lent, 1991); they are thought to be related…”
- Gender moderates the relation between implicit and explicit self-esteem (2005, background): “…(e.g., memory, stereotypes; see Banaji & Hardin, 1996; Schacter, 1996; Wilson, Lindsey, & Schooler, 2000; but cf. Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997), it should come as no surprise that measures of implicit and explicit self-esteem are only weakly related (for a review see Koole & Pelham, 2003).”
- Morality and competence in person- and self-perception (2005, methodology): “…the most frequently used measure of narcissism (Raskin & Hall, 1979); in one sample a measure of state self-esteem (Heatherton & Polivy, 1991); and in one sample the preference of own initials over other letters of the alphabet was used as an implicit measure of self-esteem (Koole & Pelham, 2003).”
- Untangling the links between narcissism and self‐esteem: A theoretical and empirical review. (2008, unknown): “Other perspectives suggest that people lack insight into their automatic attitudes toward the self (Koole & Pelham, 2003) and thus cannot report accurately on these feelings.”
- What lies beneath: Parenting style and implicit self-esteem. (2006, background): “The reason for this correlation between name-letter and birthday-number preferences is likely due to the similarity in the type of cognitive processing required to complete the two measures (Koole & Pelham, 2002; see also Dijksterhuis, 2004).”