The Role of Affect in Public Support and Opposition to Wolf Management
By K. Slagle, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, R. Wilson. 2012
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4bda6e2e465e3669b1d96b11e0595b0f3f34066
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Ecology
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jeremy T. Bruskotter
- R. Wilson
- K. Slagle
- Ajay S. Singh
- M. Jacobs
- Jerry J. Vaske
- D. Fulton
- M. Lewicka
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing Tolerance for Wildlife: Clarifying Relations Between Concepts and Measures (2015, background): “We argue that much can be learned from studying attitudes and other cognitions that provide potential internal mechanisms for understanding such behavior (see Slagle et al. 2012, for example).”
- Determining Where the Wild Things will be: Using Psychological Theory to Find Tolerance for Large Carnivores (2014, background): “Similarly, Slagle et al. (2012) found that benefit perceptions were a better predictor (than risk perceptions) of respondents’ intentions to support wolf recovery in the United States (β = 0.67 [benefits]; −0.13 [risk]).”
- More than fear: role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves (2014, background): “Positive or negative feelings toward wolves predicted beliefs about the outcomes of wolf recovery (Slagle et al. 2012).”