Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief: The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance

By Barry M. Mitnick. 2000

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82c78285d4face5baff736805ecf81ce35aeeb2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. F. Dejean
2. James E. Mattingly
3. A. Crane
4. P. Naccache
5. Jean‐Pascal Gond
6. Tobias Hahn
7. J. Griffin
8. B. Leca

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. P. Naccache
2. B. Leca
3. Frank Figge
4. Tobias Hahn
5. F. Dejean
6. James E. Mattingly
7. A. Crane
8. Jean‐Pascal Gond

In Strategy and Management

1. Tobias Hahn
2. Frank Figge
3. P. Naccache
4. B. Leca
5. Jean‐Pascal Gond
6. A. Crane
7. F. Dejean
8. James E. Mattingly

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century (2000, background): “See also Mitnick (2000), who elaborates on social expectations in his article in this issue.”
• A Critical Realist Approach To Institutional Entrepreneurship (2006, background): “Moreover, no consensual definition of corporate social performance existed (Mitnick, 2000).”
• Corporate Social Performance Disoriented: Saving the Lost Paradigm? (2010, methodology): “…when scholars are confronted with the problem of CSP measurement derived from CSP theory, they appear to prefer to rely on an alternative framework (e.g., Clarkson, 1995), new theoretical materials (e.g., Mitnick, 2000), or even to abandon the CSP construct itself (e.g., Rowley & Berman, 2000).”
• Origin of the Theory of Agency: An Account By One of the Theory's Originators (2013, unknown): “Mitnick has so far made applications of this to the theory of the state (Mitnick 2000), the metrics of corporate social performance (Mitnick 1999), and other areas.”
• Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry (2004, methodology): “…4 1 DOI: 10.1177/0018726704044954 Volume 57(6): 741–764 Copyright © 2004 The Tavistock Institute ® SAGE Publications London, Thousand Oaks CA, New Delhi www.sagepublications.com dimensions that cannot be reduced to a unique ratio (Agle & Kelley, 2001; Mitnick, 2000; Rowley & Berman, 2000).”
• Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability (2011, background): “roots in the field of organizations and environment (Bansal and Gao 2006; Etzion 2007; Kallio and Nordberg 2006), there is also a rich body of research that addresses social issues in management such as research on corporate social responsibility (Lockett et al. 2006) and corporate social performanc”
• The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies (2011, unknown): “…find that reputation indices based on the perceptions of business executives and analysts represent a companies’ reputation in the business community rather than to provide a valid measure of the assessment of all stakeholders (Wood and Jones 1995; Mitnick 2000; Peloza and Papania 2008).”
• Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data (2017, background): “Several investigators note that CSP indicators do not converge on a single dimension (Johnson & Greening, 1999; Mattingly & Berman, 2006; Szwajkowski & Figlewicz, 1999), corresponding to the complexity of the construct’s theorized multi-dimensionality (Carroll, 1979, 2000; Mitnick, 2000).”