Throw 'em out or make 'em better? State and district high-stakes writing assessments

By Steve Graham, Michael A. Hebert, K. Harris. 2011

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The writing of school-aged children is assessed for many reasons (Graham, Harris, & Hebert, 2011). Teachers assess writing to monitor students' growth as writers, inform instruction, provide feedback, and evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching. Students assess their own writing to appraise growth, identify strengths, and determine areas in need of further development. Peers assess other students' writing to provide them with feedback on what works in a paper and what still needs work. States and school districts assess writing to determine how many students meet local or state performance standards, identify youngsters who need extra help, and evaluate the effectiveness of individual teachers and schools. The national government administers the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) writing test to measure American students' collective writing success, evaluating students' writing performance across time. Given the heavy emphasis now placed on assessment and evaluation as a tool for improving and reforming writing and other aspects of education in the United States (Gewertz, & Robelen, 2010; National Commission on Writing, 2003), it is important to ask whether the various forms of assessment, ranging from classroom-based writing assessments to state and district evaluations (the focus of this article) do, in fact, make a difference in improving how well students write? For students with disabilities, such questions are especially important, as so many of these students experience difficulty learning to write. On the 2007 NAEP (Salahu-Din, Persky, & Miller, 2008), just 6% of eighth-grade and 5% of twelfth-grade students with disabilities performed at or above the "proficient" level in writing (defined as solid academic performance). Students scoring below this level are classified as obtaining only partial mastery of the literacy skills needed at their respective grade. Thus, this assessment indicates that 19 of every 20 students with disabilities do not acquire the writing skills needed for success in school. Although classroom-based assessments are not the focus of this article, evidence shows that such assessments can make a difference in improving how well students write. A recent meta-analysis of experimental and quasi-experimental studies conducted mostly with typically developing students (Graham, Kiuhara, McKeown, & Harris, 2011 ) provided empirical evidence that writing assessments that are part of typical classroom practices improve the overall quality of students' writing. When students receive feedback about their writing and learning progress, writing improves. When students evaluate their own writing, writing

Subfields: Education, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/828f7938e53509a3c0de4461193e571f276ecdd9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Teaching writing to middle school students: a national survey (2013, methodology): “…about the negative impact of high stakes assessments on writing programs have been raised by a number of researchers (Applebee & Langer, 2006, 2011; Graham et al., 2011b; Hillocks, 1986), and include narrowing of the writing curriculum, too much attention on test preparation, and emphasizing…”
Common Core State Standards, Writing, and Students with LD: Recommendations (2013, methodology): “The data supporting each of the identiﬁed practices were taken from meta-analyses we conducted (Graham, 2006b; Graham et al., 2011b; Graham, Kiuhara, McKeown, & Harris, in press; Graham & Perin, 2007a, 2007b; Graham & Hebert, 2011; Sandmel & Graham, 2011) and represent the work of a host of writing…”
A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing (2018, background): “Although emotions can moderate what a writer does, the collective emotions of community members may impact the mood and work of a writing community too, just as emotions themselves are responsive to social situations and relationships within that community (Graham et al., 2011).”
The Relationship Between Component Skills and Writing Quality and Production Across Developmental Levels (2016, background): “Furthermore, as suggested in the work of Graham, Hebert, and Harris (2011), a single, cumulative score appears to capture writing quality given that ratings of student’s writing across several different traits are typically moderately to highly related.”