A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.)

By Tiffany A. Whittaker. 2011

663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81a8321e18c2fcf03542e14edeacc33f84432e09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland (2017, methodology): “However, commonly used alternative fit indices demonstrated a good fit with a chi-square divided by degrees of freedom (χ 2 /df)=4.74 of below 5 (Schumacker & Lomax, 2010), Comparative-Fit index (CFI)=.94, Goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=.93, Tucker-Lewis-Index (TLI)=.92 were all above the recommended…”
Using Mentoring Enactment Theory to Explore the Doctoral Student–Advisor Mentoring Relationship (2012, methodology): “…(RNCS), the non-normed-fit index (NNFI), the incremental fit index (IFI), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were used to examine the model fit (Hooper, Cougham, & Mullen, 2008; Kline, 2005; Schumacker & Lomax, 2010; Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007).”
An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior (2012, background): “Kline (2005) and Schumacker and Lomax (2010) recommended a variety of model fit criteria when determining model fit of a structural model.”
Authoritative School Climate and Student Academic Engagement, Grades, and Aspirations in Middle and High Schools (2016, background): “The procedure allows for “theoretically meaningful relationships among variables that cannot be specified in a single additive regression model” (Schumacker & Lomax, 2010, p. 156), including multivariate relationships among several outcome measures.”
Evidence Regarding the Internal Structure: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2017, methodology): “Residual matrices refer to the differences between S and (Hair et al., 2006) and are useful to examine which covariance terms are not well supported by the model, especially the standardized residuals (Schumacher & Lomax, 2010).”
Affectivity, Emotional Labor, Emotional Exhaustion, and Emotional Intelligence in Coaching (2016, methodology): “We specifically employed latent variable interaction model technique (Schumacker & Lomax, 2010).”
Teacher Decision Factors That Lead to Preschool Expulsion: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation of the Preschool Expulsion Risk Measure (2018, background): “…χ2 test and its degrees of freedom falls below 5 (Marsh & Hocevar, 1985); the root mean square error of approximation is ideally 0.08 and below; and the Comparative Fit Index and the Tucker–Lewis Index have to be greater than 0.90 to indicate acceptable fit (Kline, 2005; Schumacker & Lomax, 2010).”
Integrative and suppressive emotion regulation differentially predict well-being through basic need satisfaction and frustration: A test of three countries (2020, background): “90 were considered evidence of acceptable fit (Browne and Cudeck 1993; Hoyle 1995; Schumacker and Lomax 2010).”
Students’ Growth Mindsets, Goals, and Academic Outcomes in Mathematics (2017, methodology): “The fit of our data to hypothesized models was deemed good or adequate if the RMSEA values were less than or equal to .05 or .08, respectively (Schumacker & Lomax, 2010) and if CFI values were greater than or equal to .95 and .90, respectively (McDonald & Marsh, 1990).”
Not All Autonomy is the Same. Different Dimensions of Job Autonomy and Their Relation to Work Engagement & Innovative Work Behavior (2016, methodology): “The chi-square is sensitive to sample size (Hooper, Coughlan, & Mullen, 2008; Schumacker & Lomax, 2012); therefore, other indices are used to assess model fit.”
The Influence of Socioeconomic Status, Self-Efficacy, and Anxiety on Mathematics Achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA (2015, neutral): “CFI, NFI, GFI values close to .90 or .95 reflect a good fit (Hu & Bentler, 1998; Marsh, Hau, & Wen, 2004; Schumacker & Lomax, 2010).”