Preservice Elementary Teachers' Analysis of Mathematics Instructional Materials

By Gwendolyn M. Lloyd, Stephanie Behm. 2005

52 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Elementary Teachers' Learning to Construct High-Quality Mathematics Lesson Plans (2013, background): “Left to their own devices, teachers may rely on what is consistent with their experiences as learners and misinterpret the intention of curricular structures and student activities (Lloyd & Behm, 2005).”
Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (2012, background): “Other new teachers change their materials, but their adaptations are often limited to the practical and affective aspects of teaching (Lloyd & Behm, 2005; Nicol & Crespo, 2006; Schwarz et al., 2008).”
Strategic Compromise a Student Teacher's Design of Kindergarten Mathematics Instruction in a High-Stakes Testing Climate (2007, background): “(p. 110) Recently, reports of mathematics teacher educators’ efforts to engage teachers in such activities have begun to appear in the literature (Arbaugh & Brown, 2005; Frykholm, 2005; Lloyd, 2006; Lloyd & Behm, 2005).”
AN EXAMINATION OF THE LEVELS OF COGITIVE DEMAND REQUIRED BY PROBABILITY TASKS IN MIDDLE GRADES MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS (2007, background): “…form an important part of the call from researchers for prospective teachers to critically analyze textbooks and other curriculum materials (Lloyd & Behm, 2005; Remillard, 2004), In addition, preservice teachers with experience in analyzing curricula may be better prepared to assist in the…”