Choosing Between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Community College Student Voices
By Shanna Smith Jaggars. 2014
378 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fb78f38d08c795dcf91ff38ae20ff9199f0b5b4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Performance Gaps between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas (2014, background): “…studies have found that students in online courses experience higher levels of dissatisfaction, interpersonal isolation 2000; hana & kling, 1999; Jaggars, 2014). these studies suggest that the typical online course is not explicitly designed to help students develop the skills they need to…”
- Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress (2018, result): “Similarly, students who reported comfort with taking online classes tended to perform better overall in the course as evidenced by course assignments and overall averages which is supported in prior studies (Chigeza & Halbert, 2014; Jaggars, 2014).”
- How do online course design features influence student performance? (2016, methodology): “…the fl exibility of online coursework in order to balance school with work or family demands (Choy, 2002; Jaggars, 2014); and in part because community college students may particularly struggle in online courses due to relatively low levels of self-directed learning skills (Xu & Jaggars, 2014).”
- Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity (2016, neutral): “It is well established that the frustrations stemming from technical difficulties with online learning environments can cause students to drop out or have reduced commitment to their studies (Jaggars 2014).”