Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all (2018, background): “…to their viable strategies to reconcile competing goals in terms of local impact and faculty engagement (Etzkowitz, 2014; McAdam et al. 2012; Landry et al., 2013), and, at the same time, they can use the business model concept to promote change and trigger sense-making as they seek to…”
Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms (2015, background): “…value proposition for business model innovation in the context of technology shifts (Tongur and Engwall, 2014), the role of technology transfer organizations (Landy et al., 2013) and embedding cost-effective designs in order to form a commercially viable business concept (Chen et al., 2014).”
Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation (2018, unknown): “Using data from a survey of Research and Technology Organisations (RTOs), an important form of innovation intermediary (Howells, 2006; Oxford Economics, 2008; Arnold et al., 2010; Landry et al., 2013; Miller, 2014), the paper seeks to contribute in three ways to our knowledge of innovation intermedi”