Who publishes in “predatory” journals?
By Jingfeng Xia, Jennifer L. Harmon, Kevin Connolly, Ryan M. Donnelly, Mary R. Anderson, H. Howard. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c26750766caea386f6b1b5a5562883821df87c0f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2019, background): “Similarly to Xia et al. (2015), they find that the regional distribution of authors is highly skewed to Asia and Africa (35% from India and 8% from Nigeria), even if a notable 6% are based in the US.”
- ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015, result): “Xia et al. also studied the origin of authors in seven pharmacological journals included in the above list and found a strong dominance of Indian authors, with Nigerian and Pakistani authors in second and third place [18].”