The Econometrics of Corporate Governance Studies

By Sanjai Bhagat, Richard H. Jefferis. 2002

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e9ffe77db2746be850a6b0cebbc0dabd76f35fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Capital Structure, Shareholder Rights, and Corporate Governance (2007, unknown): “Bhagat and Jefferis (2002) summarize several studies using 3SLS and 2SLS to examine economic relationships involving ownership, such as Bhagat and Black (2001) and Demsetz and Villalonga (2002).”
Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness (2005, unknown): “While some papers use the market-to-book ratio as the dependent variable (Barnhart et al. , 1994), others use versions of Tobin’s q ratio (Agrawal and Knoeber, 1996; Yermack, 1996; Bahgat and Black, 1998; Bhagat and Jefferis, 2002; Weir et al. , 2002).”
One Share, One Vote: The Empirical Evidence (2007, unknown): “…discuss the managerial ownership literature; Hermalin and Weisbach (2003) discuss corporate boards; Burkart and Panunzi (2006) discuss takeovers; Bhagat and Jefferis (2002) discuss antitakeover measures, and Hu and Black (2006) discuss the role of institutions and derivative markets in…”
Does Corporate Governance Matter to Bondholders? (2005, background): “…whole, the literature suggests that different models of the role of corporate governance and takeover defenses are plausible, and that strong statistical tests of the models’ predictions are extremely difficult to implement due to problems of measurement and endogeneity (Bhagat and Jefferis, 2002).”
Corporate philanthropic practices (2006, unknown): “More effective monitoring is likely to arise from 4 Bhagat and Jefferis (2002) at p. 10.”
An institution-based view of executive compensation: A multilevel meta-analytic test (2012, methodology): “Endogeneity-conscious researchers usually use a fixed- or random-effects panel data model, and calculate instrumental variables using two- or three-stages least squares (2/3SLS) or the generalized method of moments (GMM) (Bhagat & Jefferis, 2002).”
The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Value of the Firm in Developing Countries: Evidence from Bangladesh (2011, methodology): “According to Black (2001), Klapper and Love (2004), Gompers, et al.”