Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes
By Michael A. Jones, Kate L. Reynolds, Mark J. Arnold. 2006
1,015 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e860a5323d0233abd41afdf3a0ff436445ead98
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Heesup Han
- S. Jang
- Kisang Ryu
- Heikki Karjaluoto
- Y. Ekinci
- Sunghyup Sean Hyun
- Drew Martin
- Hae-Kyung Sohn
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap (2020, background): “Utilitarian value begins with a task and consumers’ perceived benefits depend on whether the task is done successfully in the process or not [38] (Jones et al., 2006).”
- Perceived benefits of loyalty programs: Scale development and implications for relational strategies☆ (2010, neutral): “…research pertaining to perceived benefits in general (e.g., Haley, 1968), the customer-perceived benefits of loyalty programs refer to the perceived value customers attach to their experience with the program (Holbrook, 1996; Keller, 1993)—that is, what the program can provide or do for members.”
- Still work and/or fun? Corroboration of the hedonic and utilitarian shopping value scale (2020, background): “the succeeding discussion focuses on the most relevant results for online context: pleasure, arousal, satisfaction, word-of-mouth, repatronage intentions, and flow (Atulkar & Kesari, 2017; Jones et al., 2006; Overby & Lee, 2006; Stoel et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2007).”
- The effect of TQM practices on employee satisfaction and loyalty in government (2010, background): “The findings of other studies on value and satisfaction provide support for linking value to satisfaction, not satisfaction to value (Babin, Lee, Kim, & Griffin, 2005 ; Jones, Reynolds, & Arnold, 2006 ).”
- Online repatronage intention: an empirical study among Malaysian experienced online shoppers (2014, background): “In fact, repatronage intentions reflect the probability that a customer will shop at a retail store again, while loyalty is customer deeply held commitment to a specific brand or a particular retailer ( Jones et al., 2006; Oliver, 1999).”
- Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk (2014, background): “Prior studies on offline and online shopping confirm the importance of these values in driving loyalty and repeat purchase intention (Jones et al., 2006; Overby & Lee, 2006).”