Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of Dutch firms

By L. Uhlaner, H.J.M. van Goor-Balk, Enno Masurel. 2004

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e856ecb3f068ec889f5f5677c248787c5632270

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Birgit Feldbauer-Durstmüller
2. Marcus Wagner
3. Dima Jamali
4. C. Mitter

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Birgit Feldbauer-Durstmüller
2. Marcus Wagner
3. Dima Jamali
4. C. Mitter
5. R. Mirshak

In Strategy and Management

1. Dima Jamali
2. Marcus Wagner
3. R. Mirshak
4. J. Graafland
5. H. Smid
6. Juelin Yin
7. Benjamin A. Neville

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis (2010, background): “Still indicating a possibly higher awareness and activity of family firms with regard to corporate sustainability, Uhlaner et al. (2004) find that inclusion of the family surname in the firm’s name increases perceived CSP.”
• Communicating sustainability: A web content analysis of North American, Asian and European firms (2008, background): “…a geographical perspective regarding sustainability reporting Page 2 Sustainability is recognised as the basis for corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Korhonen, 2003) which refers broadly “to the level of contribution a company makes towards the betterment of society” (Uhlaner et al 2004:186).”
• Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research (2018, background): “Hence, family firms avoid actions Table 8 Actions to build a firm’s image and reputation Factor Sources Build strong relationships with stakeholders 21 Binz et al. (2013); Carrigan and Buckley (2008); Chen et al. (2008, 2010); De la Cruz Déniz Déniz and Cabrera Suárez (2005); Fernando and Almeida”
• Family Management, Family Ownership, and Downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 Firms: (2008, unknown): “This article’s findings also contribute to the debate on whether family firms are more socially responsible toward their employees than are nonfamily firms (e.g., Deniz & Suarez, 2005; Dyer & Whetten, 2006; Gallo, 2004; Stavrou et al., 2007; Uhlaner et al., 2004; Wiklund, 2006).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context (2007, background): “Some studies have referred to various types of CSR – economic, legal, ethical, philanthropic (Uhlaner et al., 2004); others have utilized a stakeholder approach, examining the CSR obligations and contributions of firms vis-a-vis an array of key stakeholders (Longo et al., 2005); while others have…”