A Meta-Analytical Review of Teacher Credibility and its Associations with Teacher Behaviors and Student Outcomes

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned? (2014, background): “The formal education literature, however, has long considered teachers’ verbal and non-verbal communication styles to be prominent determinants of student outcomes (Finn et al. 2009).”
Instructor Credibility as a Mediator of Instructors’ Prosocial Communication Behaviors and Students’ Learning Outcomes (2009, background): “…and credibility (e.g., Finn et al., 2009; McCroskey et al., 2004; Myers, 2001; Schrodt, 2003; Schrodt et al., 2006), as well as among instructor credibility and students learning outcomes (e.g., Finn et al., 2009; Schrodt, Witt, Turman et al., 2008; Teven & McCroskey, 1997; Tibbles et al., 2008).”
Instructional Feedback I: The Interaction of Facework and Immediacy on Students' Perceptions of Instructor Credibility (2011, background): “A recent meta-analysis reported a consistent, moderate association between perceived instructor credibility and a variety of other teacher behaviors/characteristics and student outcomes (Finn et al., 2009).”
Equity Beyond Bias in Language Technologies for Education (2019, background): “We also know that instructor credibility is tied to demographics (Bavishi et al., 2010), as are student evaluations of a teacher’s trustwor-thiness and caring (Finn et al., 2009).”