Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned?

By Marc J. Stern, Robert B. Powell, D. Hill. 2014

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/378a0a30a34f0e92324e6fd4d1ec3eee99db3faf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. N. Ardoin
2. Noelle E. Wyman Roth
3. A. Bowers
4. N. Holthuis

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. N. Ardoin
2. Noelle E. Wyman Roth
3. A. Bowers
4. N. Holthuis

Citations in the corpus

• Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review (2019, neutral): “Furthermore, using some form of control- or comparison-group would also be beneficial [36].”
• Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens (2021, neutral): “Various authors therefore suggested that studies across several projects should be conducted and a common theoretical framework and common methods should be applied (e.g. Peter et al., 2019; Phillips et al., 2018; Stepenuck & Green, 2015; Stern et al., 2014).”
• Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research (2018, methodology): “We followed Stern et al. (2014) and used environmental education as the primary term.”