Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex

By Edward M. Hubbard, Manuela Piazza, Philippe Pinel, Stanislas Dehaene. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2005

1,236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dcd59e559d8273ec2a35bb939fa29f2790f00ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. (2011, neutral): “…(Siegler, 1996), reviews of the literature on whole number magnitude representations (e.g., Ansari, 2008; Dehaene, Dehaene-Lambertz & Cohen, 1998; Fias & Fischer, 2005; Hubbard et al., 2005) typically do not even mention strategies or strategy choices (for exceptions, see Geary et al., 2007, 2008).”
Origins and Development of Generalized Magnitude Representation (2011, background): “The second issue concerns whether the space dimension may have a special (foundational) role as the primary grounding of the general magnitude system (see [109] for a discussion of how space may structure numerical representations).”
Short Article: Coding Strategies in Number Space: Memory Requirements Influence Spatial–Numerical Associations (2008, neutral): “This interaction between number size and spatial response features has been consistently interpreted as evidence that numerical magnitude information is spatially coded and is associated with a mental continuum (“mental number line”) on which numbers are consecutively arranged in an ascending order ”
A validation of eye movements as a measure of elementary school children's developing number sense (2008, background): “The “mental number line” is regarded as the core neurocognitive system underlying number sense (Fias, Lammertyn, Reynvoet, Dupont, & Orban, 2003; Hubbard, Piazza, Pinel, & Dehaene, 2005; Pinel, Dehaene, Riviere, & LeBihan, 2001), which in turn underlies a variety of”
Cultural recycling of cortical maps. (2007, positive): “Interestingly, the putative human homolog of area LIP is also active during some number processing tasks (Dehaene et al., 2003), fuelling the speculation that the VIP-LIP circuitry is partially recycled for mental arithmetic in humans (Hubbard et al., 2005).”
The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing (2011, neutral): “On the one hand, one could argue that the reading habits were strong enough to overpower the daily experience of “more is up,” but on the other hand, the same participants in Hung et al.’s (2008) study developed only horizontal (and no vertical) SNARC for Arabic digits, suggesting great flexibility ”
The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning difficulties (2014, positive): “Given their anatomical connections, these processes may mature at the same rate and share developmental trajectories (Chinello et al., 2013), while also sharing impairment in the event of parietal lesions (Hubbard et al., 2005).”
A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science (2012, background): “There is substantial evidence, for example, that response effects observed during number processing feature the reuse of a particular circuit in the left inferior parietal sulcus that plays a role in shifting spatial attention (Hubbard et al, 2005).”
On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect (2008, background): “Reflecting an increasing scientific interest in the SNARC effect in its various forms, four qualitative reviews have appeared in the recent past (Fias and Fischer, 2005; Gevers and Lammertyn, 2005; Hubbard et al., 2005; Cohen Kadosh et al. 2008).”
Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement : Their interrelations in grades 5 and 6 (2009, background): “This association between numerical magnitude and space is independent of the notation (e.g., can be found for Arabic symbols as well as written words), the response type (e.g., button press vs. eye saccades), and handedness (cf. Hubbard et al., 2005 ).”