Response Ability: The Language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise

By R. Dove. 2001

382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7cd10ddf2c941154ce423fc00732028012089407

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry (2017, background): “Dove (2001) related the responding component o “response ability,” which he defined as the physical ability to ct; he also related the sensing component to “knowledge mangement” – the intellectual ability to identify situations requiring ction.”
Dynamic Organizations: Achieving Marketplace And Organizational Agility With People (2003, background): “dynamics of so-called self-organizing or emergent behavior in actual organizations (Dove, 2001; Pascale, et al, 2000).”
Facilitating speed of internationalization: The roles of business intelligence and organizational agility (2020, background): “Hence, given these two capabilities of organizational agility, firms are more likely to prepare for the acquisition of the explicit knowledge to implement their international strategies (Dove, 2001; Sambamurthy et al., 2003).”
Leveraging Information Technology Infrastructure to Facilitate a Firm's Customer Agility and Competitive Activity: An Empirical Investigation (2012, background): “First, agility is best viewed as an organizational capability, that is, a set of organizational routines and processes that produces a particular output [26].”
Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success (2016, background): “Agility refers to the ability to survive and progress in the variable and unpredictable environment (Dove, 2001).”
Investigating firm's customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities (2012, background): “First, agility is best viewed as an organizational capability, a set of organizational routines and processes that produces a particular output (Dove, 2001).”
Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT (2006, background): “‘‘The ability of an organization to thrive in a continuously changing, unpredictable business environment (Dove, 2001).’’”
Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination (2011, background): “Organizational agility is a firm's ability to cope with rapid, relentless, and uncertain changes and thrive in a competitive environment of continually and unpredictably changing opportunities (Dove 2001; Goldman et al. 1995).”
Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities (2019, background): “Response ability, as argued by Dove (2001), reflects “an organizational structure that enables change and an organizational culture that facilitates change” (p. 11 ).”
Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology (2006, unknown): “For example, Dove (2001) referred to the responding component as ‘response ability’, which he defines as the physical ability to act, and to the sensing component as ‘knowledge management’, which he defines as the intellectual ability to find appropriate things to act on.”