The viability of probiotic bacteria as a factor influencing the immune response in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

By A. Panigrahi, V. Kiron, J. Puangkaew, Takeshi Kobayashi, S. Satoh, H. Sugita. 2005

414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Aquatic Science, Immunology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7cc0526feb7951d67c29daf0199c35b1065f412d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. E. Ringø
2. R. L. Olsen
3. S. Davies
4. H. Yu
5. A. N. Wang
6. X. J. Li
7. D. Merrifield
8. C. Lim

In Aquatic Science

1. E. Ringø
2. D. Merrifield
3. S. Davies
4. R. L. Olsen
5. B. Glencross
6. B. Magnadóttir
7. Zhigang Zhou
8. A. Dimitroglou

In Immunology

1. E. Ringø
2. D. Merrifield
3. S. Davies
4. R. L. Olsen
5. Zhigang Zhou
6. B. Glencross
7. A. Dimitroglou
8. F. Gatesoupe

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of Inactivated Enterococcus faecalis and Mannan Oligosaccharide and Their Combination on Growth, Immunity, and Disease Protection in Rainbow Trout (2013, background): “…in either a viable (Balcázar et al. 2006, 2007a, 2007b; Kim et al. 2006; Aly et al. 2008; Dı́az-Rosales et al. 2009) or nonviable form (Villamil et al. 2002; Irianto and Austin 2003; Panigrahi et al. 2005; Dı́azRosales et al. 2006; Salinas et al. 2006; Choi et al. 2008; Pan et al. 2008).”
• Immunological Control of Fish Diseases (2010, background): “Some of these have been tested in aquaculture with generally good results (Nikoskelainen et al. 2003; Li and Gatlin III 2005; Panigrahi et al. 2005; Aly et al. 2008; Ma et al. 2009).”
• Live yeasts in the gut: Natural occurrence, dietary introduction, and their effects on fish health and development (2007, background): “To my knowledge, the effect of yeast viability on fish immunity has not been tested, whereas it was demonstrated that immune responses of rainbow trout were different when probiotic bacteria were supplied either active or inactivated (Irianto and Austin, 2003; Brunt and Austin, 2005; Panigrahi et al”
• Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of probiotics and prebiotics in finfish aquaculture (2009, background): “…a positive effect on fish health (Brunt a d Austin 2005; Salinas et al. 2005; Kim and Austin 2006a, 2006b; Taoka et al. 2006a; Pirarat et l. 2006; Panigrahi et al. 2004, 2005, 2007; Balcázar et al. 2006a, 2007a, 2007c; Gomes and Balcázar 2008; Mesalhy et al. 2008; Vendrell et al. 2008; Wang et…”
• The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids (2010, background): “, 2010c), dead cells (e.g. Irianto and Austin, 2003; Panigrahi et al., 2005; Newaj-Fyzul et al., 2007), disrupted cells (e.”
• Effects of Probiotic Bacteria as Dietary Supplements on Growth and Disease Resistance in Young Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque) (2007, methodology): “Panigrahi et al. (2005) emphasized that viability of the bacterium was an important consideration to obtain a probiotic effect.”
• Microbial intervention for better fish health in aquaculture: the Indian scenario (2007, background): “Viable live probionts are better than the non-viable heat killed probionts in inducing a higher immune response in rainbow trout especially in the head kidney leucocyte phagocytosis, serum complements, etc (Panigrahi et al. 2005).”
• Innate and adaptive immunity in teleost fish: a review. (2018, background): “These have been tested in aquaculture with generally good results (Panigrahi et al., 2005; Aly et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2009).”