Forced-Choice Personality Tests: A Measure of Personality and Cognitive Ability?

By Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos, Jeffrey M. Cucina, N. Dyomina, Courtney L. Morewitz, Richard R. Reilly. 2006

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b8217df241953b7bf8f665e28d5219a051941d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. D. Simonet
2. R. Tett
3. T. Judge
4. Tariq Iqbal Khan
5. A. Somech

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Simonet
2. R. Tett
3. T. Judge
4. Tariq Iqbal Khan
5. Cindy P. Zapata
6. A. Somech
7. Thomas W. H. Ng

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Simonet
2. R. Tett
3. T. Judge
4. Tariq Iqbal Khan
5. A. Somech

Citations in the corpus

• Faking in Personality Assessment: A “Multisaturation” Perspective on Faking as Performance (2011, background): “Thus, increased validity of forced-choice measures suggested as due to reduced faking ( Jackson, Wroblewski & Ashton, 2000 ) has also been attributed to unintended measurement of g ( Christiansen et al, 2005 ; Vasilopoulos, Cucina, Dyomina, Morewitz & Reilly, 2006 ).”
• The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies (2014, unknown): “….15 7.20 .90 .88 Slocum and Hand (1971) 57 EPPS I JPR .17 .07 .05 .02 7.17 – – (continued overleaf ) APPENDIX B (Continued ) Reference N Inventory Format Criterion ES EX O A C ryy u Slocum and Hand (1971) 37 EPPS I JPR 7.05 .17 .05 .20 .02 – – Sommerfeld (1997) 332 GPI Q JPR .01 – – – .32 – –…”