On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy.

By Joel T. Nigg. Psychological bulletin, 2000

1,984 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b29afb65dd4104fd9fce7f0d6c0c404ae88c87d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Psychiatry and Mental health

Citations in the corpus

Early Intervention and the Development of Self-Regulation (2002, result): “The distinction that is proposed here between effortful control and impulsivity is similar to the distinction suggested by Nigg (2000) between more effortful, executive types of inhibition and motivational inhibition.”
A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function (2010, background): “interference control, cognitive inhibition, and motor inhibition may be distinct processes tapped by different tasks and develop at different rates across childhood (Nigg, 2000).”
Executive Functions (2012, positive): “Certainly automatic inhibition (such as that seen in the attentional blink or negative priming) is dissociable from the volitional, effortful inhibitory control discussed here (Carr et al. 2006, Nigg et al. 2002), and although effortful inhibition declines with aging, it is unclear whether automatic”
Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. (2010, background): “Eisenberg and colleagues (e.g., Eisenberg & Morris, 2002; see also Carver, 2005; Derryberry & Rothbart, 1997; Nigg, 2000) have sought to differentiate, conceptually and empirically, the regulatory processes involved in effortful control from other aspects of control/inhibition (or the lack thereof)…”
Executive Functions after Age 5: Changes and Correlates (2009, background): “…inhibitory demands seem to vary depending on whether WM is also needed (Garon et al., 2008; Roberts & Pennington, 1996), on the response modality (e.g., motor, oculomotor, or verbal response; Diamond & Taylor, 1996; Nigg, 2000), and on the degree of response prepotency (Diamond & Taylor, 1996).”
Storage capacity explains fluid intelligence but executive control does not (2012, background): “…studies, showing that different types of inhibition and conflict resolution are specific and distinct executive functions, tending to operate at a low level of human cognitive architecture (e.g., Egner, 2008; Keye, Wilhelm, Oberauer, & van Ravenzwaaij, 2009; Nigg, 2000; Shilling et al., 2002).”
Inhibition in dot comparison tasks (2015, neutral): “ Inhibition can be conceptually distinguished into many categories; in a review of constructs and related measurement paradigms Nigg (2000) specified four types of processing: interference control, cognitive inhibition, behavioural inhibition and oculomotor …”
Personality development: stability and change. (2005, methodology): “Sociability may primarily tap elements of approach and positive emotionality, whereas shyness may be a more multidimensional trait combining elements of low approach, high negative emotionality, and high behavioral avoidance (Nigg 2000).”
ADHD symptoms and personality: relationships with the five-factor model (2004, background): “Other basic personality dimensions (such as openness to experience, agreeableness and conscientiousness) have received very little research attention (Nigg, 2000; White, 1999).”