Measuring employee perception of performance management system effectiveness

By N. Sharma, Tanuja Sharma, M. N. Agarwal. 2016

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a12e0ca9100a85f9326483044218695c1720d1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Joaquín Alegre
2. S. Awan
3. Andrés Salas‐Vallina
4. Nazia Habib
5. Chaudhry Shoaib Akhtar
6. R. Peccei
7. Adelien Decramer
8. S. Naveed

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Andrés Salas‐Vallina
2. Joaquín Alegre
3. S. Awan
4. Nazia Habib
5. Chaudhry Shoaib Akhtar
6. R. Peccei
7. Adelien Decramer
8. Thomas Van Waeyenberg

Citations in the corpus

• Performance management and teacher performance: the role of affective organizational commitment and exhaustion (2020, background): “Although employee experiences with performance management precede subsequent outcomes, more work is needed to unravel which experiences exactly are favorable (Sharma et al., 2016).”
• Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement (2020, methodology): “We use the scale of Sharma et al. (2016) to measure PMSA that includes items about clarity and accuracy of goal setting, as recommended by GST. PMSE also cannot be achieved without participative and specific goal setting and, therefore, is embedded in GST to explain its usefulness.”
• Happiness at work: Developing a shorter measure (2018, methodology): “Next, we follow a four-step process to shorten the HAW scale (creating SHAW) on the basis of the practice of Matthews, Kath, and Barnes-Farrell (2010), Kacmar, Crawford, Carlson, Ferguson, and Whitten (2014) and Sharma, Sharma, and Agarwal (2016).”