Moral emotions and moral behavior.
By June P Tangney, J. Stuewig, Debra J. Mashek. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007
2,922 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78b91838627eb2c02e07c2fb544acd004edac7e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- T. Cohen
- Nidhi Agrawal
- Dahee Han
- Adam Duhachek
- Jan E. Stets
- Richard P. Bagozzi
- David M. Mayer
- J. Hook
Citations in the corpus
- Consumer responses to corporate social irresponsibility: The role of moral emotions, evaluations, and social cognitions (2019, background): “As Tangney et al. (2007) claim, “empathic reactions to others’ distress often elicit feelings of concern for the distressed other” (p.18).”
- Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed (2012, neutral): “…school often show no significant treatment effects (Karna et al., 2011; for narrative reviews and meta-analyses, see Fossum, Handegård, Martinussen, & Mørch, 2008; Merrell, Gueldner, Ross, & Isava, 2008; Smith, Schneider, Smith, & Ananiadou, 2004; Vreeman & Carroll, 2007; Wilson & Lipsey, 2007).”
- “Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes? (2015, positive): “However, prior research in this journal (Steenhaut and Kenhove 2006; Theotokis and Manganari 2014) and elsewhere (Luchs, et al. 2012; Peloza et al. 2012; Tangney et al. 2007) has shown that not choosing greater sustainability can also lead to feelings of guilt.”
- My Anger Is Your Gain, My Contempt Your Loss: Explaining Consumer Responses to Corporate Wrongdoing (2013, background): “Tangney, Stuewig, and Mashek (2007) also stress that moral emotions represent an important element of an individual’s moral apparatus and may be critically important in explaining people’s behavior in moral domains.”
- A Theory of the Self for the Sociology of Morality (2012, background): “One might expect shame to be about public transgressions and guilt to involve private transgressions, but research fails to support this distinction (Tangney et al. 2007).”
- Moral disengagement of hotel guest negative WOM: moral identity centrality, moral awareness, and anger. (2014, background): “Anger serves “moral functions in that it can motivate „third-party‟ bystanders to take action in order to remedy observed injustices” (Tangney et al., 2007, p. 361).”
- Origins of human cooperation and morality. (2013, background): “They do not do these things in control situations that are similar but in which the adult does not need help; for instance, they do not pick up an object the adult has thrown down intentionally or open a door he approaches with no intention of opening it (Warneken & Tomasello 2006, 2007).”
- WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR (2012, background): “Guilt has been well established as a correlate of ethical behavior (Tangney et al., 2007: 354), in part because it elicits a sense of personal responsibility for one’s actions (Tangney, 1991).”
- The moral self: A review and integration of the literature (2015, background): “The focus on self-reflection and monitoring makes these emotions an integral part of the moral self (Tangney et al., 2007).”
- Narcissism and academic dishonesty: The exhibitionism dimension and the lack of guilt (2011, background): “For example, narcissists are self-serving (Rhodewalt & Morf, 1998), self-centered (Emmons, 1987), and unlikely to consider how their decisions can affect others (Campbell, Bush, Brunell, & Shelton, 2005).”