A Theory of the Self for the Sociology of Morality

By Jan E. Stets, Michael J. Carter. 2012

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f658dd78741a29ecbde016f20c3a6be82575c4c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Jan E. Stets
2. Peter J. Burke
3. Fabiola H. Gerpott
4. Niels Van Quaquebeke
5. S. Voelpel ‡
6. Sofia Schlamp
7. S. Hannah
8. P. L. Jennings

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jan E. Stets
2. Peter J. Burke
3. Fabiola H. Gerpott
4. Niels Van Quaquebeke
5. S. Voelpel ‡
6. Sofia Schlamp
7. P. L. Jennings
8. S. Hannah

Citations in the corpus

• The Development of Identity Theory (2014, methodology): “(Stets & Carter, 2011, 2012).”
• An Identity Perspective on Ethical Leadership to Explain Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Interplay of Follower Moral Identity and Leader Group Prototypicality (2019, methodology): “Secondly, we used an explicit measure of moral identity to capture the current importance of moral characteristics for participants in their self-concept (Stets and Carter 2012).”
• The moral self: A review and integration of the literature (2015, background): “…shown to invoke guilt, but acts that reflect poorly on one’s identity (I am bad) invoke shame (e.g., Ferguson, Stegge, & Damhuis, 1991; Fromson, 2006; Hong & Chiu, 1992; Olthof, Ferguson, Bloemers, & Deij, 2004; Rothschild, Landau, Sullivan, & Keefer, 2012; Stets & Carter, 2012; Tangney, 1991).”