Non-dirty dancing? Interactions between eco-labels and consumers

By M. Teisl, J. Rubin, C. Noblet. 2008

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76fe9802dbb8bcb63203382e34d53188a1052bec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Consumer support for environmental policies: An application to purchases of green cars (2009, background): “Teisl et al. (2008) present a model on the interrelationship between individual consumer characteristics (including consumer motivations) and the content of information policies.”
Varieties of Environmental Labelling, Market Structures, and Sustainable Consumption Across Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational and Market Supply Determinants of Environmental-Labelled Goods (2011, background): “…individualistic explanations of sustainable consumerism (Bjørner et al. 2004; Micheletti et al. 2004; OECD 1997, 2005; Stolle et al. 2005; Teisl et al. 2008; Thøgersen 2000; van Amstel et al. 2008), only recently there has been an increasing focus on institutional, structural, and…”
A better carbon footprint label (2016, background): “…on other types of eco-labeling suggests that consumers’ understanding of the information such a label seeks to convey, and consequently its impact on their choices, depends on subtle cues in the label’s design (Heinzle and Wüstenhagen, 2012; Ölander and Thøgersen, 2014; Teisl et al., 2008).”
Willingness to Pay for Multiple Seafood Labels in a Niche Market (2014, result): “…preferences and demographic characteristics found in this study generally are supported by previous findings in the seafood ecolabeling literature, although the evidence is mixed (see Teisl, Rubin, and Noblet 2008; Johnston et al. 2001; Wessells, Johnston, and Donath 1999; Brécard et al. 2009).”
The impact of consumer confusion from eco-labels on negative WOM, distrust, and dissatisfaction (2017, background): “ing, whereas Teisl et al. (2002) in a qualitative study of environmental labeling of wood products suggest that eco-labeling influences consumer purchasing decisions and that”
Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe (2015, background): “Teisl et al. (2008) find that more educated people are more likely to trust eco-labels and find eco-information more important but also are more likely to rate eco-labeled vehicles lower.”
Improving Eco-labelling as an Environmental Policy Instrument: Knowledge, Trust and Organic Consumption (2014, background): “As argued above, eco-labels are designed as an informative instrument to send an accessible message to consumers that a particular product has environmental attributes distinguishing it from non-labelled alternatives (Teisl et al., 2008).”
Individual strategies for sustainable consumption (2012, background): “However, this segmentation approach did not produce clear evidence which allowed researchers to identify these groups consistently or reliably in practice (Peattie, 2001 ; Roberts, 1996 ; Straughan & Roberts, 1999 ; Teisl, Rubin, & Noblet, 2008 ; Van Liere & Dunlap, 1980 ; Wagner, 1997 ).”