AN EXPLORATORY CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF INTERLANGUAGE PRAGMATIC DEVELOPMENT

By Kenneth R. Rose. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2000

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/757c5daf5788619ad9b88240c377c8e8acede307

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Naoko Taguchi
2. Carsten Roever
3. G. Kasper
4. Alireza Jalilifar
5. C. Kinginger
6. K. Bardovi-Harlig
7. S. Youn

Citations in the corpus

• Request Strategies: Cross-Sectional Study of Iranian EFL Learners and Australian Native Speakers. (2009, background): “…developmental pragmatics by comparing data from learners at various levels of proficiency while other studies were in fact "single-moment" research- they did not compare learners at different levels of proficiency but, instead , just compared non-native and native speakers (Rose, 2000, p.29).”
• Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development (2001, background): “In the same paper, he cautioned that ‘this theoretical framework is not a model of communicative competence, where model implies some specification of the manner and order in which the components interact and in which the various competencies are normally acquired’ (p. 12, italics added).”
• Task Difficulty in Oral Speech Act Production (2007, background): “Previous studies mainly measured L2 speech acts based on learners’ knowledge, as exemplified in the types of linguistic expressions, and the extent to which they approximated native speaker choices (e.g. Maeshiba et al. 1996; Rose 2000; Trosborg 1995).”
• Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics (2006, background): “d Do scores on the speech act section increase as learners ESL proficiency increases?: Knowledge of speech acts increased with proficiency, as previous research (Trosborg, 1987; Takahashi and DuFon, 1989; Hill, 1997; Rose, 2000; Achiba, 2002) predicts; see Table 8.”
• Comprehending Implied Meaning in English as a Foreign Language (2005, background): “…have seen how pragmatic development in L2 toward native-speaker norms positively correlates with overall L2 proficiency (Bardovi-Harlig & Dörnyei, 1998; BardoviHarlig & Hartford, 1993; Churchill, 2000; DuFon, 2001; Ellis, 1992; Hill, 1997; Roever, 2001; Rose, 2000; Taguchi, 1999; Trosborg, 1995).”