Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity
By Wei-Ru Chen, Kent D. Miller. 2007
699 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/755f646b141d3f7f208e233b3be8dc86626e561c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
- Ji-Yub Kim
- Jerayr Haleblian
- Sydney Finkelstein
- Philip Bromiley
- Jared D. Harris
- Henrich R. Greve
In Economics and Econometrics
In Strategy and Management
- R. Hoskisson
- J. Eggers
- Aseem Kaul
- George A. Shinkle
- Philip Bromiley
- Curba Morris Lampert
- Sydney Finkelstein
- Jared D. Harris
Citations in the corpus
- Managerial Risk Taking (2016, positive): “Chen (2008), Chen and Miller (2007), and J. Y. Kim et al. (2015) show that historical and social aspirations may have opposite effects, whereby risk taking increases when the firm’s performance is above historical aspirations but decreases when performance is above social aspirations.”
- Aspirations, Innovation, and Corporate Venture Capital: A Behavioral Perspective (2012, neutral): “…average of the innovation performance of all other fi rms in fi rm i’s three-digit Standard Industrial Classifi cation (SIC) code (Greve, 2003b; Chen and Miller, 2007);7 and we defi ne fi rm i’s historical aspiration as an exponentially weighted moving average of its past innovation…”
- CEOs’ Regulatory Focus and Risk-Taking When Firms Perform Below and Above the Bar (2021, result): “While prior studies have shown that organizational factors of firm size (e.g., Audia & Greve, 2006; Greve, 2010) and organizational slack (e.g., Chen & Miller, 2007) are important boundary conditions to managerial risk-taking that reverse BTOF predictions, our findings suggest that CEO regulatory…”
- Firm Profitability, State Ownership, and Top Management Turnover at the Listed Firms in China: A Behavioral Perspective (2009, neutral): “Thus, according to this perspective, the positive impact of privatization on firm profitability results from improvement in corporate governance quality, which refers to the degree to which managers are held accountable for firm profitability (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997; Megginson, 2005).”
- Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions (2017, background): “Firms then increase their R & D intensity (Chen and Miller, 2007; Greve, 2003a) and the number of R & D projects they undertake (Salge, 2011), and are more likely to adopt innovations (Damanpour, 1987).”
- Untangling the Effects of Overexploration and Overexploitation on Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism† (2008, methodology): “Along with the effort of this study, some other recent works (e.g., Beckman et al., 2004; Chen & Miller, 2007; Greve, 2007) have already headed in that direction by further unraveling the specific factors that underlie firms’ search behavior.”
- Motivation and Ability? A Behavioral Perspective on the Pursuit of Radical Invention in Multi-Technology Incumbents (2017, positive): “…may be highest at performance levels moderately below aspirations, and may decline as performance falls further below aspirations to the point where managers see their very survival being threatened (Audia & Greve, 2006; Chen & Miller, 2007; Hu, Blettner, & Bettis, 2011; March & Shapira, 1992).”