Measuring and Motivating Quantity, Creativity, or Both

By Steven J. Kachelmeier, B. E. Reichert, Michael G. Williamson. 2008

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/745ac39069bc28af5e760f07fcebd08cc39e8e74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Joan Luft
2. Michael D. Shields
3. J. Leiby
4. Steven J. Kachelmeier
5. A. M. Farrell
6. Jonathan H. Grenier
7. Matthew Hall
8. Klaus Derfuss

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Michael D. Shields
2. Joan Luft
3. J. Leiby
4. A. M. Farrell
5. Jonathan H. Grenier

In Safety Research

1. Michael D. Shields
2. Joan Luft
3. Michael G. Williamson
4. J. Leiby
5. A. M. Farrell
6. Jonathan H. Grenier
7. Steven J. Kachelmeier
8. Geoffrey B. Sprinkle

Citations in the corpus

• Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting (2011, unknown): “Kachelmeier et al. (2008) found that agency theory did not completely explain their results when combining quantity and creativity performance measures.”
• Attracting Creativity: The Initial and Aggregate Effects of Contract Selection on Creativity-Weighted Productivity (2010, background): “Recent research by Kachelmeier, Reichert, and Williamson (2008) (henceforth KRW)”
• Scoundrels or Stars? Theory and Evidence on the Quality of Workers in Online Labor Markets (2017, background): “…studies have asked participants to create “rebus puzzles,” in which words, pictures, symbols, and numbers are used to depict familiar words or phrases (Kachelmeier et al. 2008; Kachelmeier and Williamson 2010), or to develop proposals for the use of a neglected historic building (Chen et al. 2012).”
• Psychology Models of Management Accounting (2010, methodology): “They limit their need to consider multiple attributes in choosing between alternatives by using noncompensatory decision models (Shields, 1980; Kachelmeier et al., 2008), using only attributes that are easily compared across alternatives (Lipe and Salterio, 2000), or avoiding decisions that require ”
• Creativity and Control: A Paradox. Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework (2017, unknown): “Kachelmeier, Reichert, and Williamson (2008), for instance, found that even though pure creativity-based rewards may increase creative output, compensation schemes that emphasize both creativity and quantity are not associated with more creative output relative to a reward structure based on…”