Selection Processes in Monolingual and Bilingual Lexical Access.

By W. Heij. 2005

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/742b69138d0e9fc6e0ca6163248fc41dc350ed81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes (2011, background): “…views have agreed that some mechanism must select the desired language for lexicalization (Costa, Miozzo, & Caramazza, 1999; D. W. Green, 1998; La Heij, 2005) and that exercising this 16 But one could see that frequent exposure to environments emphasizing music, video game play, computer use, or…”
Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon (2007, background): “This is not to deny the possibility that some cross-linguistic interactive activation might have taken place at the lexical level (cf. Dijkstra & van Heuven, 2002; La Heij, 2005), which does not undermine the effects obtained at the syntactic combinatorial level.”
Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, background): “La Heij (2005) has recently articulated this position most clearly.”
Lexical access in bilingual speakers: What's the (hard) problem? (2006, methodology): “And, as we have reviewed in this article, La Heij (2005) has similarly proposed that the speaker’s intentions may serve to differentially activate the target language over the nontarget language.”
Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning (2013, result): “…language cross-activation needs to be restricted in the first place (for a discussion of this issue see Finkbeiner, Gollan, & Caramazza, 2006b; La Heij, 2005), recent neuroimaging studies provide compelling results for inhibition that may converge with an IC model (e.g., Abutalebi & Green, 2007,…”
More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. (2008, background): “…in both languages (Green, 1998; Hermans, Bongaerts, de Bot, & Schreuder, 1998; Lee & Williams, 2001; Poulisse, 1997; for reviews see Costa, 2005; La Heij, 2005), even when the task requires bilinguals to speak in just one language (Colomé, 2001; Costa, Caramazza, & Sebastián-Galles, 2000; Gollan &…”
The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children* (2008, background): “To manage this conflict, bilinguals must attend to the relevant language system and ignore the unwanted system to assure fluency in speech production (e.g., Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Green, 1998; La Heij, 2005).”
Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies (2008, background): “Such an outcome is consistent with an inhibitory account but it is also consistent, as they propose, with the notion that the nature of selection changes such that a language cue plays a more prominent role (cf. La Heij, 2005).”
What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency?: The dual-task analogy (2010, background): “…researchers of bilingualism that the dominant language interferes with production in the non-dominant language (for exceptions, see Costa, 2005; La Heij, 2005), and all models that accept the notion of interference between languages propose an asymmetry such that interference is greater in…”
Juggling Two Languages in One Mind (2008, background): “…are able to exploit information in their intention to speak one language alone to either prevent the activation of competing candidates from the language not in use (e.g., La Heij, 2005) or to ignore that activation when it occurs (e.g., Costa, 2005; Finkbeiner, Gollan, & Caramazza, 2006).”
Language control in bilinguals: Monolingual tasks and simultaneous interpreting (2006, background): “La Heij, W. (2005). Selection processes in monolingual and”