Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes

By J. Drury, Stephen D. Reicher. 2005

462 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73eb7063ca588bf65bb266d53a079c17fed04f1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Making a Virtue of Evil: A Five‐Step Social Identity Model of the Development of Collective Hate (2008, background): “…2008 The Authors Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2/3 (2008): 1313–1344, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00113.x Journal Compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd we have termed ‘collective self-objectification’ (Drury & Reicher, 2005) or ‘collective self-realisation’ (Reicher & Haslam, 2006b).”
Community identity as resource and context: A mixed method investigation of coping and collective action in a disadvantaged community (2013, background): “…56 57 58 59 60 For Peer Review Community Identity as Resource and Context 6 action, while in turn the outcomes of collective action will have consequences for the future participation of group members (Drury & Reicher, 2005) as well as its impact or not on the conditions of the group (Louis, 2009).”
Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: the role of collective follower emotion and action (2013, background): “This realization prompted Drury and Reicher (2005) to suggest that emotion and reason are “interwoven as causes of collective action, not separate pathways” (p. 720).”
Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? (2011, background): “…reasons, the key variable in the psychology of collective action among the disadvantaged is the relevant group that individuals identify with (Ellemers, 1993; Tajfel, 1978; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; see also Drury & Reicher, 2005, 2009; Klandermans, 1997; Mummendey, Kessler, Klink, & Mielke, 1999).”
Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (2018, background): “…resulted in a number of integrative and testable models of core motivations for collective action (Becker & Tausch, 2015; Becker, Tausch, & Wagner, 2011; Drury & Reicher, 2005, 2009; Subašić, Reynolds, & Turner, 2008; Tausch et al., 2011; Thomas, Mavor, & McGarty, 2012; Van Zomeren, 2013, 2016a).”
Four Core Social‐Psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action (2013, background): “I therefore join a chorus of voices in the literature that call for a focus on dynamics (Drury & Reicher, 2005, 2009; Klandermans, 1997; van Zomeren & Iyer, 2009).”
A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers (2015, background): “However, there is relatively little research on how protest affects individuals and how experiences at a demonstration feed back into activists’ motivation to participate in future collective action (e.g., Louis, 2009; Wright, 2009; but see Drury & Reicher, 2000; 2005).”
The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide (2011, background): “In SCT studies, participation to collective rituals (e.g., demonstrations ) was indeed related to increased identification to the social group, polarization of beliefs, reconstruction of social beliefs, commitment to social values, and empowerment (Drury & Reicher, 2005; Reicher, 2004).”
The emotional link: Leadership and the role of implicit and explicit emotional contagion processes across multiple organizational levels (2015, background): “The sharing of such emotions within a group setting can also motivate collective action (Drury & Reicher, 2005, 2009; Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 2002; Iyer & Leach, 2008).”
The experience of collective participation: shared identity, relatedness and emotionality (2011, background): “Crowd members can feel empowered to shape their world when those around them successfully act in unison to realise shared goals (collective self-objectification, CSO), an experience characterised by intense positive affect (Drury & Reicher, 1999 , 2005 , 2009).”
The biographical consequences of protest and activism: a systematic review and a new typology (2017, background): “Drury and Reicher (2000, 2005) found that experiencing defeat by a more dominant group – for example, when the police evicted protesters and felled a tree that people were trying to save – can bring about disempowerment.”
How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking (2020, background): “Considerable attention has been paid to how ingroup support and collective efficacy can form the basis of intergroup conflict and social change (e.g., Drury & Reicher, 2005; Reicher & Haslam, 2006).”