A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers
By J. Becker, Nicole Tausch. 2015
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3053009b83922be0cdd7d884362fa01fe4d03d66
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Miles Hewstone
- Gordon Hodson
- Kristof Dhont
- Ana C. Leite
- Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels
- Maja Kutlaca
- S. A. Haslam
- Jolanda Jetten
In Social Psychology
- Kristof Dhont
- Miles Hewstone
- Gordon Hodson
- Ana C. Leite
- S. A. Haslam
- Jolanda Jetten
- T. Pettigrew
- C. Haslam
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kristof Dhont
- Miles Hewstone
- S. van der Linden
- Gordon Hodson
- Ana C. Leite
- T. Pettigrew
- S. Rosenthal
- Matthew T. Ballew
Citations in the corpus
- Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM) (2016, background): “Alternatively, they can also collectively organize to challenge the status-quo and promote social change (see Becker & Tausch, 2015; van Zomeren, Postmes, & Spears, 2008), which likely increases high-status group members’ perceptions of threat posed by low-status groups to existing social…”
- The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1 (2017, background): “Numerous studies demonstrate that minority members who have experienced the most intergroup contact are in general more reluctant to protest for change (Dixon et al., 2010; Saguy, Tausch, Dovidio & Pratto, 2009; Wright & Lubensky, 2008; for a review see Becker & Tausch, 2016).”
- Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (2018, background): “This concurs with the possibility of feedback loops between key variables in other models of collective action (Van Zomeren et al., 2012; see also Becker & Tausch, 2015), but so far those have not included a moral motivation for collective action.”
- The Greta Thunberg Effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg predicts intentions to engage in climate activism in the United States (2021, background): “…including appraisal of injustice, collective efficacy, affect, and social identification as factors that predict collective action intentions (Becker & Tausch, 2015; van Zomeren & Iyer, 2009), our findings suggest that exposure to inspirational young public figures like Greta Thunberg is…”
- The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses (2019, background): “…one important avenue to resilience or growth may involve collective action and activism in response to the traumatic experiences (e.g., as seen in the “#metoo” and “#churchtoo” movements spearheaded by survivors of sexual abuse; Becker & Tausch, 2017; van Zomeren, Kutlaca, & Turner-Zwinkels, 2018).”
- Why do youth participate in climate activism? A mixed-methods investigation of the #FridaysForFuture climate protests. (2021, background): “…research on igh-impact behaviors such as collective action can aid theory development (Lange et al., 2021; Nielsen et al., 2021; van Valkengoed et al., 2021), that has the potential for more wide-ranging impact (Bamberg et al., 2018; Becker & Tausch, 2015; Dalton, 2015; Stern & Wolske, 2017).”