Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

By D. A. Cook, Anthony J. Levinson, S. Garside, D. Dupras, P. Erwin, Victor M. Montori. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2008

1,514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Dentistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71f900f6424b47646308101b60d3f5dbadb955dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education (2020, methodology): “Similarly, several studies make claims for e-learning and learning enhancement, but the results appeared rather mixed [4, 21, 22].”
Computerized Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2010, background): “20–26 In the present review, we sought to identify and summarize all studies involving virtual patients for training health professionals.”
Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice (2011, background): “Some have focused on particular populations, such as K-12 students (e.g., Cavanaugh et al. 2004), postsecondary students (e.g., Jahng et al. 2007) and health care professionals (e.g., Cook et al. 2008 ).”
Mastery Learning for Health Professionals Using Technology-Enhanced Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2013, background): “The studies in this review shared the common theme of mastery learning with SBME, but as has been found in other meta-analytic syntheses of education research, 9,16,49 between-study variability (inconsistency) was large in most analyses.”
Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019, background): “Evaluations have failed to reach consistent conclusions [4,5], resulting in complex decisions when selecting a teaching method for medical education.”
Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, methodology): “…Research Study Quality Instrument (Reed et al. 2007) and an adaptation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies (Wells et al. 2007; Cook et al. 2008b) that evaluates representativeness of the intervention group (ICC, 0.68), selection of the comparison group (ICC, 0.26 with raw…”