:Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong

By R. Richards. 2008

441 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7199e284a04558d937ae5135336db8a80f8a5607

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History and Philosophy of Science

Citations in the corpus

Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality (2016, background): “See Hauser (2006) for an exposition of these various principles in the context of psychology and neuroscience.”
The Psychology and Sociology of Fraud: Integrating the Behavioral Sciences Component Into Fraud and Forensic Accounting Curricula (2008, background): “For several years now, anthropologists, psychologists, and evolutionary theorists have argued that our ethical and moral life evolved from nature (cf., Hauser 2006).”
When Mental States Matter, When They Don't, and What That Means for Morality (2013, background): “A complementary approach, though, is to identify universal moral rules (e.g., DeScioli, Asao, & Kurzban, 2012; Hauser, 2006; Mikhail, 2007) that apply to all moral judgments, independent of the culturespecific content of culture-specific moral codes.”
Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption (2008, background): “This conceptualization makes sense given that most work on moral development argues that our ethical orientation to the world is socially learned rather than a genetic inheritance (Bandura, 1986; Kohlberg, 1984; though see Hauser, 2006 for a different view).”
Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. (2009, methodology): “…al., 2007; Mendez, Anderson, & Shapira, 2005; Schaich Borg, Hynes, Van Horn, Grafton, & Sinnott-Armstrong, 2006) and psychological (Cushman, Young, & Hauser, 2006; J. Greene, Morelli, Lowenberg, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2008; M Hauser, Cushman, Young, Jin, & Mikhail, 2007; Mikhail, 2000, 2007; Moore,…”
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. (2011, neutral): “In so doing, it will become evident that moral intuitions are not based on asocial principles of right actions, such as prohibitions against intentionally causing harm (Hauser, 2006; Mikhail, 2007; Turiel, 1983) and inequality (Turiel, 1983) or concerns with “purity” (Haidt, 2007).”
We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. (2007, background): “This is signifi cant in itself, but even more intriguing was the realization that, without the ability to adequately access the guiding intuitions that accrue through emotional learning and social feedback, decision making and rational thought became compromised, as did learning from their mistakes…”
Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions (2010, methodology): “When interpreting our results within the context of moral dynamics [33], our main discoveries for a society facing public goods games may be summarized as follows: 1.”
The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. (2008, background): “Recent research in the psychology of morality has begun to converge on a dual-process model of moral judgment (Cushman, Young, & Hauser, 2006; Greene, Nystrom, Engell, Darley, & Cohen, 2004; Haidt, 2001; Pizarro & Bloom, 2003; Valdesolo & DeSteno, 2006).”
Thriving With Social Purpose: An Integrative Approach to the Development of Optimal Human Functioning (2007, background): “Although meaning can be derived from many different kinds of goal content, the intrinsically social nature of humans (Hauser, 2006; Richerson & Boyd, 2005) makes goals that connect people to other people of particular interest in understanding motivation and optimal functioning.”
Order effects in moral judgment (2012, background): “In particular, during the past decades, trolley dilemmas have become a keystone for testing alternative normative (e.g., Kamm, 2007) and descriptive (e.g., Hauser, 2006) theories of moral judgment.”
Modelling morality with prospective logic (2007, methodology): “In all cases, the initial circumstances are the same (Hauser, 2007): There is a trolley and its conductor has fainted.”
Mapping the Moral Domain (2011, background): “…literatures include decision making about runaway trolleys, in which participants must make tradeoffs between harm and rights (Cushman, Young, & Hauser, 2006; Greene et al., 2009); economic games, which pit fairness against selfinterest (Fehr & Gachter, 2002); and the perennially popular topic…”
Morality (2008, background): “It should be noted that issues related to harm, fairness, and justice appear to be found in all cultures, including non-Western ones (Hauser, 2006; Waynryb, 2006).”