We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education.

By M. Immordino‐Yang, Antonio R. Damasio. 2007

1,207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent advances in neuroscience are highlighting connections between emotion, social functioning, and decision making that have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the role of affect in education. In particular, the neurobiological evidence suggests that the aspects of cognition that we recruit most heavily in schools, namely learning, attention, memory, decision making, and social functioning, are both profoundly affected by and subsumed within the processes of emotion; we call these aspects emotional thought. Moreover, the evidence from brain-damaged patients suggests the hypothesis that emotion-related processes are required for skills and knowledge to be transferred from the structured school environment to real-world decision making because they provide an emotional rudder to guide judgment and action. Taken together, the evidence we present sketches an account of the neurobiological underpinnings of morality, creativity, and culture, all topics of critical importance to education. Our hope is that a better understanding of the neurobiological relationships between these constructs will provide a new basis for innovation in the design of learning environments. Note: The lead author appears twice in this issue of LEARNing Landscapes: first in the reprint cited below, and next, in an accompanying follow-up article that features poetry from her daughter Nora Ming-Min Yang. Immordino-Yang, M.H., & Damasio, A.R. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain and Education, 1(1), 3–10. * Reprinted in Jossey-Bass Reader on the Brain and Learning (pp. 183–198). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8eb0e17979d7faf3119104ce863641d861881872

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. S. D’Mello
  2. F. Korthagen
  3. A. Graesser
  4. Emilia Fägerstam
  5. Sue J. Waite
  6. Linda Darling-Hammond
  7. Julia Yarmolinskaya
  8. Lily Steyer

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. S. D’Mello
  2. A. Graesser
  3. F. Korthagen
  4. Emilia Fägerstam
  5. Linda Darling-Hammond
  6. Sue J. Waite
  7. Lily Steyer
  8. Christina R. Krone

Citations in the corpus