The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite.

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From inconsistency to hypocrisy: When does “saying one thing but doing another” invite condemnation? (2018, background): “…than one holds oneself (Graham et al., 2015; Lammers, 2012; Lammers, Stapel, & Galinsky, 2010; Polman & Ruttan, 2012; Rustichini & Villeval, 2014; Valdesolo & DeSteno, 2007, 2008); and the insincerity perspective describes hypocrisy as the espousal of moral values that are more virtuous than…”
Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction (2011, methodology): “While traditional mediation analysis comes to mind immediately to test this account, Valdesolo and DeSteno (2008) test this process account in a 2 2 factorial design with two manipulated variables that are examined statistically via an interaction term.”
Sweatshop Labor Is Wrong Unless the Shoes Are Cute: Cognition Can Both Hurt and Help Motivated Moral Reasoning (2013, unknown): “As such, another study found that participants viewed their own un-fair behavior as being less fair when under cognitive load than without (Valdesolo & DeSteno, 2008).”
Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it (2013, background): “Some evidence suggests that the willingness to cut oneself moral slack in the face of temptations toward self-interest is volitional rather than automatic (Valdesolo & DeSteno, 2008).”