The innovation value chain
By S. Roper, Jun Du, J. Love. 2006
685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70ef353af207dd70a4626f3287e299ee52f63a35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christoph Zott
- Violina P. Rindova
- Luis L. Martins
- Raphael Amit
- Lorenzo Massa
- Bruce E. Greenbaum
- Rune Bysted
- M. A. Mansury
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring Managerial Mechanisms that Influence Innovative Work Behaviour: Comparing private and public employees (2014, background): “Reducing the riskiness of innovative work behaviour may enhance the number of employees involved in innovative work behaviour, but it also limits the performed innovativeness, as a large number of new ideas can impede implementation (Hansen and Birkinshaw 2007).”
- Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: a firm-level analysis (2008, methodology): “For example, in a study based on data from Ireland Roper et al (2006) find that process innovation has no effect on productivity and product innovation actually reduces productivity.”
- Unlocking the Hidden Value of Concepts: A Cognitive Approach to Business Model Innovation (2015, background): “Put in the context of general innovation research, our theory pertains to the ‘idea generation’ phase (Hansen and Birkinshaw, 2007), as it explains how strategists originate new designs of potentially value-creating new business models.”
- Innovation, ownership and profitability (2009, methodology): “…terms, we have argued elsewhere that the relationship between an innovation event and its successful exploitation is essentially recursive (Roper et al., 2006): innovation output measures are necessarily predetermined prior to exploitation – the innovation cannot be exploited until it has…”
- Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems (2021, unknown): “Stage one consists of efforts to source the different types of knowledge necessary for innovation (Hansen & Birkinshaw, 2007; Roper et al. 2008).”
- The business model: Theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research (2010, background): “…& Prencipe, 2009, European Management Review Chesbrough & Appleyard, 2007, California Management Review Gulati, 1998, Strategic Management Journal Hansen & Birkinshaw, 2007, Harvard Business Review Jacobides & Billinger, 2006, Organization Science Jacobides, Knudsen, & Augier, 2006, Research…”
- The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level (2016, background): “Furthermore, the network can aid in translating trends and opportunities into more and better ideas for innovation projects (Brettel and Cleven, 2011; Hansen and Birkinshaw, 2007; Sandulli et al., 2012).”
- From Every Direction–-How Personality Traits and Dimensions of Project Managers Can Conceptually Affect Project Success (2013, background): “Combining these two aspects, Hansen and Birkinshaw (2007) propose that innovativeness refers to the degree of innovation developed within organizations, leading to a differentiation advantage and higher performance.”
- From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms (2009, unknown): “The ability of a firm to develop new ideas for future entrepreneurial action is generally accepted as being a precursor for firm-level innovative behavior and may be a source of competitive advantage if firms are able to capitalize on their ideas (e.g. Hansen and Birkinshaw, 2007).”