Learning Through Constructing Representations in Science: A framework of representational construction affordances
By Vaughan Prain, Russell Tytler. 2012
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f6b665ca4f3ca843cfb048ae980b13d19a3e154
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Christine D. Tippett
- Vaughan Prain
- Russell Tytler
- Joseph Ferguson
- Radhika Gorur
- George Aranda
- Perry D. Klein
In Education
- Christine D. Tippett
- Vaughan Prain
- Russell Tytler
- Joseph Ferguson
- Radhika Gorur
- George Aranda
- Perry D. Klein
Citations in the corpus
- Drawing to reason and learn in science (2020, methodology): “Schwartz (1995) noted the benefits of collaborative drawing, in which the specificity and explicitness of drawings provide opportunities for peers to exchange and clarify ideas.”
- How Students Learn Content in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Through Drawing Activities (2019, unknown): “Another way to help students focus on structural relations is to productively constrain how students draw by specifying what disciplinary drawing conventions to use (Prain and Tytler 2012).”
- What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science (2016, methodology): “Furthermore, models such as DeFT (Ainsworth, 2006), IF-SO (Carolan et al., 2008), and RCA (Prain & Tytler, 2012) may not fully explain the intricacies of the processes and reasoning involved when students construct their own representations.”