Framing effects on adolescent task representations, analytic and heuristic processing, and decision making: Implications for the normative/descriptive gap

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (irt). (2016, background): “Although the present results are in line with earlier studies which investigated developmental changes in heuristic reasoning between adolescence and adulthood (e.g., Chiesi et al., 2011; Klaczynski, 2001a; Morsanyi & Handley, 2013), it should be noted that the groups not only differed in their age.”
Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. (2008, unknown): “71(5):1347–66 Klaczynski PA. 2001.”
The Development of Judgment and Decision Making During Childhood and Adolescence (2002, background): “Nonnormative reasoning includes a variety of heuristics, biases, and errors that have no basis in formal reasoning (see Klaczynski, 2001b, or Stanovich, 1999, for detailed discussions of normative vs. biased reasoning).”
Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples (2005, background): “Typically, previous demonstrations of people’s ability to adhere to the normative standard of first-order logic have explicitly instructed people to adhere to this norm (Evans & Over, 1996; Markovits et al., 2002; Stanovich & West, 1998; but see Klaczynski, 2001b).”