The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (irt).

By Caterina Primi, Kinga Morsanyi, Francesca Chiesi, M. Donati, J. Hamilton. 2016

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0423c5721e65302ac34a216dca9466eac53a3ac6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Teresa McCormack
2. Kinga Morsanyi

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. E. O’Mahony
2. Teresa McCormack
3. Kinga Morsanyi

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. M. Donati
2. Francesca Chiesi
3. Caterina Primi
4. Kinga Morsanyi

Citations in the corpus

• The link between deductive reasoning and mathematics (2018, background): “Mathematical reasoning about word problems: The CRT-long (Primi et al., 2016) is an extended version of the CRT (Frederick, 2005).”
• Are there gender differences in cognitive reflection? Invariance and differences related to mathematics (2018, methodology): “Cognitive reflection was measured by the Italian version of the CRT-L (Primi et al., 2016) as in Study 1.”
• Political Ideology Predicts Perceptions of the Threat of COVID-19 (and Susceptibility to Fake News About It) (2020, background): “The CRT contained nine items (a ¼ .735) taken from several sources (Baron et al., 2015; Oldrati et al., 2016; Primi et al., 2016; Thomson & Oppenheimer, 2016; Toplak et al., 2014).”