The Development of Judgment and Decision Making During Childhood and Adolescence

By J. Jacobs, P. Klaczynski. 2002

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7012fcd3c25582b079df1125747f7825af0c951

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Géry d'Ydewalle
2. Laurence Steinberg
3. Baruch B. Schwarz
4. Walter Schaeken
5. Ty W. Boyer
6. Dustin Albert
7. Wim De Neys
8. Jonathan Evans

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. George Spanoudis
2. Antigoni Mouyi
3. Géry d'Ydewalle
4. Laurence Steinberg
5. Amnon Glassner
6. Baruch B. Schwarz
7. Walter Schaeken
8. Ty W. Boyer

In General Decision Sciences

1. Ty W. Boyer
2. Dustin Albert
3. Géry d'Ydewalle
4. Laurence Steinberg
5. Walter Schaeken
6. Wim De Neys
7. Jonathan Evans
8. B. Casey

Citations in the corpus

• What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? Argumentation? (2007, background): “Such an explanation fits the dual process theory (Jacobs & Klaczynski, 2002): analytical skills (including the ability to undertake syntheses) increase in the course of childhood and adolescence (Kokis, Macpherson, Toplak, West & Stanovich, 2002).”
• The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review (2006, methodology): “…in risk-taking have recently shifted focus towards the development of decision-making skills (Byrnes, 1998; Beyth- Marom & FischhoV, 1997; Furby & Beyth-Marom, 1992; Jacobs & Klaczynski, 2002; Klaczynski, Byrnes, & Jacobs, 2001; Mann et al., 1989; Tinsley, Holtgrave, Reise, Erdley, & Cupp, 1995).”
• Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples (2005, methodology): “The eight conditionals were embedded in the four inference types (MP, DA, MT, and DA), producing a total of 32 inferences for each participant to evaluate.”
• Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm (2011, background): “…approach to knowledge acquisition and problem solving where information processing is a means to the end of understanding, reasoning is a tool for evaluation and analysis, and rationality is integrative judgment that bridges multiple frames and points of view (Jacobs and Klaczynski 2002).”
• Judgment and Decision Making in Adolescence (2011, methodology): “Recent evidence suggests that, as adolescents approach adulthood, the power of behavioral intentions to predict behavior grows, ultimately surpassing behavioral willingness (Pomery, Gibbons, Reis-bergan, & Gerrard, 2009).”