Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era

By Y. Eshet-Alkalai. 2004

1,341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f35866456f0f689b71c009d8fbf9dd1e1e66999

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Use of Blogs, Wikis and RSS in Education: A Conversation of Possibilities (2006, background): “…such as collaborative content creation, peer assessment, formative evaluation of student work, individual as well as group reflection on learning experiences and user-centric up-to-date information regarding changes in collaborative spaces (Gilster, 1997; Tapscott, 1998; Eshet-Alkalai, 2004; 2005).”
Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? (2012, methodology): “At a more speci ﬁ c level, Eshet-Alkalai (2004) suggested that there are ﬁ ve types of literacies that are incorporated within the term ‘ digital literacy ’ : (i) photo-visual literacy - learning-to-read from visuals.”
Social Media Use in Higher Education: A Review (2018, background): “Digital literacy [65] is defined as the ease of use of electronic devices (smart phones, computers, etc.”
Early Attrition among First Time eLearners: A Review of Factors that Contribute to Drop-out, Withdrawal and Non-completion Rates of Adult Learners undertaking eLearning Programmes (2006, background): “This conclusion is reinforced by Eshet-Alkalai (2004), who points out that:”
The stress potential of social media in the workplace (2013, background): “2 The present: accumulating digital skills The most common current conceptualizations of Internet-related literacy are those involving digital literacy (Gilster 1997; Bawden 2001; Eshet-Alkalai 2004; Bundy 2004a; Bawden & Robinson 2008; Lankshear & Knobel 2008) and information literacy (Shapiro & Hu”
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale (2022, methodology): “Eshet (2004) proposed ﬁ ve dimensions for digital literacy: photo-visual literacy, reproduction literacy, branching literacy, informational literacy, and socioemotional literacy.”
Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction (2013, background): “Digital literacy is a term that has been addressed by several different scholarly and professional disciplines, often from different perspectives or discourses (Bawden 2008; Lankshear and Knobel 2008; Jones and Hafner 2012; Eshet-Alkalai 2004; Eshet-Alkalai and Chajut 2009).”
Promoting vocabulary, phonological awareness and concept about print among children at risk for learning disability: can e-books help? (2012, background): “Eshet-Alkalai (2004) has argued that multimedia platforms are effective due to their provision of multiple representations (text, voices, pictures, and animations) of related content.”
A systematic review on digital literacy (2022, background): “Digital literacies Digital literacy, which is one of the challenges of integration of technology in academic courses (Blau, Shamir-Inbal & Avdiel, 2020), has been defined in the current literature as the competencies and skills required for navigating a fragmented and complex information ecosystem (”
Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding (2011, background): “The perception, emphasised more and more in all the literature on this topic, is that digital competence is about essential life skills for all, even labelled as "survival skills in the digital era" (Eshet-Alkalai, 2004) or “vital assets in information society” (van Deursen, 2010).”
Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy (2008, methodology): “Eshet-Alkalai (2004) suggests that “indistinct use of the term causes ambiguity, and leads to misunderstanding, misconceptions, and poor communication” and that there is a particular inconsistency between those who regard digital literacy as primarily concerned with technical skills and those who s”