Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children's understanding of the globe as a model of the earth

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Some Assembly Required: How Scientific Explanations Are Constructed during Clinical Interviews. (2012, background): “In contrast, like diSessa (2007) and Vosniadou et al. (2005) we believe there are good warrants for continuing to understand our interviews as tools for uncovering commonsense science knowledge.”
Drawings as Representations of Children's Conceptions (2009, background): “Vosniadou, Skopeliti, and Ikospentaki (2005) responded to the criticisms of Siegal et al. (2004) and Ivarsson et al. (2002) by pointing to the question of how drawings are used to gain an idea of children’s conceptions.”
How Many Numbers are there in a Rational Numbers Interval? Constraints, Synthetic Models and the Effect of the Number Line (2007, background): “This view has its counterpart in the conceptual change literature, where there is an ongoing discussion about the effect of external representations, such as the globe or the map, on students’ reasoning and understanding — in this case, about the shape of the Earth (Ivarsson, Schoultz, & Saljo, 2002”
The Cognitive-Situative Divide and the Problem of Conceptual Change (2007, background): “mentioned studies ( Vosniadou, Skopeliti, & Ikospentaki, 2004, 2005 ) did not obtain the”