Business Survival and Success of Young Small Business Owners
By M. van Praag. 2001
576 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d37e31e480ffe03008fbcefd6d214acd85afc69
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Philipp G. Sandner
- I. Verheul
- J. Block
- K. M. Smolka
- Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina
- Étienne St-Jean
- Rosa M. Batista-Canino
- Katrin Burmeister-Lamp
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Rachida Justo
- Philipp Sieger
- Philipp G. Sandner
- J. Block
- I. Verheul
- K. M. Smolka
- Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina
- Étienne St-Jean
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Philipp Sieger
- Rachida Justo
- Dawn R. DeTienne
- K. M. Smolka
- Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina
- Étienne St-Jean
- Rosa M. Batista-Canino
- Katrin Burmeister-Lamp
Citations in the corpus
- Determinants of self-employment survival in Europe (2012, unknown): “In this sense, other measures of aggregated conditions are included in Reize (2000), Nziramasanga and Lee (2002), van Praag (2003) , Fertala (2008) and Mun ˜oz and Cueto (2008).”
- Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis (2015, background): “Exit for personal reasons includes retirement (Harhoff et al., 1998), family and family structure issues (e.g., marriage, divorce, childcare concerns, aging parent care, empty nest syndrome) (Marlow and Swail, 2014), health issues (Harada, 2007), or a change in motivation (Van Praag, 2003).”
- Why Family Matters: The Impact of Family Resources on Immigrant Entrepreneurs’ Exit from Entrepreneurship (2016, unknown): “Our hypotheses examine how family resources affect the likelihood of two alternative exit events: exit to unemployment and exit to paid employment (Taylor, 1999; Van Praag, 2003).”
- Small business survival and sample selection bias (2011, unknown): “The entrepreneurial assessment of new firm creation stems from the argument that firm start-up is largely attributable to the personal characteristics of the individual proprietor (Peteraf and Shanley 1997; Reuber and Fischer 1999; Praag 2003).”
- Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self–Employment: An International Comparison (2012, background): “More educated self-employed individuals tend to be more successful and their businesses tend to have longer duration (Van Praag, 2003).”
- Growth paths and survival chances: an application of Gambler's Ruin theory (2013, unknown): “There have been a number of valuable, recent and comprehensive reviews of studies of firm growth generally, and of new and small firms in particular: Henrekson and Johansson (2010) on gazelles — exceptionally fast growing (small) firms, Wiklund et al. (2009), Coad (2009) and Leitch et al.”
- The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures (2011, background): “Various authors have studied the influence of motivations on the subsequent success of the firm and on organisational processes (Gatewood et al. 1995; Van Praag 2003; Van Praag and Cramer 2001; Peña 2002; Collins-Dodd et al. 2004).”
- Get It Together! Synergistic Effects of Causal and Effectual Decision-Making Logics on Venture Performance (2018, background): “Research has shown that industry-specific knowledge and work experience are important for venture performance (e.g., Lee & Tsang, 2001; Van Praag, 2003).”
- Necessity and Opportunity Entrepreneurs and Their Duration in Self-employment: Evidence from German Micro Data (2009, methodology): “(3) To study the determinants of the individual duration in self-employment, we estimate several hazard rate models, which are the appropriate models for the study of durations of any kind (Brüderl et al., 1992; van Praag, 2003).”
- The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: the case of Vietnam (2012, unknown): “This result confirms previous findings by Holmes and Schmitz (1996), Reynolds and White (1997), and Van Praag (2003) showing a negative relationship between the two variables: aging makes the contribution of the founder progressively less valuable for company performance.”