Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer

By Gideon D. Markman, Phillip H. Phan, David B. Balkin, Peter T. Gianiodis. 2005

669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c56cda96915c5500092db8f3671ce76aa0f0efd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A process model of academic entrepreneurship (2011, background): “As such, the TTO can be thought of as the coordinating hub of commercialization activities, and often plays one of the most central roles in the academic entrepreneurship process (Markman et al., 2005).”
Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink? (2015, neutral): “…theories applied to the relationships between universities, technology transfer offices (TTOs) (e.g. MachoStadler, et al., 1996, 2007, 2008; Markman et al., 2005, 2006); and resource based and entrepreneurial orientation theories applied to the resources and capabilities required in both…”
Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, positive): “Markman et al. (2005a) The faster TTOs can commercialize patent-protected technologies, the greater their licensing royalties and the more new ventures they spin off.”
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “Markman et al. (2005b) Which university technology transfer offices’ (UTTOs) structures and licensing strategies are most conducive to new venture formation?”
The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, background): “Similarly, it has been demonstrated and generally accepted that university technology transfer offices play an important role in shaping entrepreneurial intention (Markman et al. 2005).”
University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs (2016, background): “Generally, the assumption is that academic entrepreneurship is facilitated by the parent university providing support, especially in presence of formal technology transfer mechanisms (Markman et al. 2005).”
Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment (2008, background): “Debackere and Veugelers 2005; Markman et al. 2005; Powers and McDougall 2005; Veugelers and Cassiman 2005).”
An Investigation of Spanish SME Innovation during Different Economic Conditions (2013, background): “grow an innovation environment(Markman et al. 2005); and supporting science park, technology center, and incubators can facilitate the”
The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities (2019, background): “This is confirmed by the evidence that TTOs may adopt different organisational structures depending on the intended goal to be pursued (Bercovitz et al. 2001; Huyghe et al., 2014; Markman et al. 2005).”
Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany (2010, background): “…are relevant in particular for technology-oriented firms and can be seen as a major source for innovation, firm growth and competitive advantage (for an overview of university-based technology transfer, see, for instance, Bozeman, 2000; Markman et al., 2005; Rothaermel et al., 2007).”
What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy (2010, background): “Markman et al. (2005b) conclude that the active participation of researchers in commercialization greatly increases the speed of innovation and the effectiveness of TTOs.”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “…capabilities (Bercovitz et al. 2001; Lockett and Wright 2005); resources spent on IP protection (Lockett and Wright 2005), for-profit structure (Markman et al. 2005b); ability to connect to bridge important social networks (Clarysse et al. 2011b; Comacchio et al. 2011; Markman et al. 2005a);…”
Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities (2016, background): “…practices that we cover include licensing and spin-out activities and are the ones that are commonly used by the literature to capture the more traditional and tangible entrepreneurial practices of universities (Rothaermel et al. 2007; Shane 2004; Guerrero and Urbano 2014; Markman et al. 2005).”