University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, background): “Entrepreneurial activity is indeed influenced by the social context and institutional environment in which the scientists are embedded, and a supporting environment will impact scientistś propensity to engage in spin-off activity (Huyghe and Knockaert 2015; Kenney and Goe 2004; Meoli and Vismara 201”
To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “Partially in contrast with this conventional wisdom, Meoli and Vismara (2016) show that the relationship between the administration of the parent university and the academic spin-offs may be controversial.”
The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, background): “First, despite the increased attention on the issue of academic entrepreneurship (Clarysse, Tartari, and Salter 2011; Fini et al. 2011; Meoli and Vismara 2016; Siegel and Wright 2015), only a few studies devote explicit attention to the determinants of academic entrepreneurial intention (AEI)…”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, unknown): “Scholars also have focused on the positive role or inadequacy of university administration (Meoli and Vismara 2016; Rasmussen and Wright 2015).”